✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints (rev2)
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Fri Oct 4 11:33:20 UTC 2024
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com> wrote:
> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00)
>>#### Possible regressions ####
>>
>> * igt at i915_selftest@live:
>> - bat-mtlp-6: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
>> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>
> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about
> tracepoints.
>
> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new CI
> cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable tracepoints. Or
> does it?
BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions.
Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series
didn't cause the failures.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list