✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints (rev2)

Gustavo Sousa gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Fri Oct 4 11:43:01 UTC 2024


Quoting Jani Nikula (2024-10-04 08:33:20-03:00)
>On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com> wrote:
>> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00)
>>>#### Possible regressions ####
>>>
>>>  * igt at i915_selftest@live:
>>>    - bat-mtlp-6:         [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
>>>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>>>   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
>>
>> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about
>> tracepoints.
>>
>> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new CI
>> cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable tracepoints. Or
>> does it?
>
>BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions.

Okay. Thanks.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
>Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series
>didn't cause the failures.
>
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list