RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints (rev2)

[Saarinen, Jani]

HI. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Saarinen, Jani
> Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 15.03
> To: Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>; Nikula, Jani
> <jani.nikula at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>; i915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints
> (rev2)
> 
> Hi.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> > Gustavo Sousa
> > Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 14.43
> > To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula at intel.com>;
> > intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>;
> > i915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display
> > tracepoints
> > (rev2)
> >
> > Quoting Jani Nikula (2024-10-04 08:33:20-03:00)
> > >On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com> wrote:
> > >> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00)
> > >>>#### Possible regressions ####
> > >>>
> > >>>  * igt at i915_selftest@live:
> > >>>    - bat-mtlp-6:         [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
> > >>>   [1]:
> > >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp-
> > 6/igt at i915_selftest@live.html
> > >>>   [2]:
> > >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mt
> > >>> lp
> > >>> -6/igt at i915_selftest@live.html
> > >>
> > >> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about
> > >> tracepoints.
> > >>
> > >> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new
> > >> CI cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable
> > >> tracepoints. Or does it?
> > >
> > >BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions.
> >
> > Okay. Thanks.
> See original BAT results mail it says " If you think the reported changes have
> nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_137978v2, please notify your bug team >
> > (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org)
> to allow them  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> positives in CI."

And ignore, I see you already added ci folks. 

> >
> > --
> > Gustavo Sousa
> >
> > >
> > >Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series
> > >didn't cause the failures.
> > >
> > >
> > >BR,
> > >Jani.
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Jani Nikula, Intel