RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints (rev2)

[Saarinen, Jani]

Hi. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Gustavo Sousa
> Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 14.43
> To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>; i915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints
> (rev2)
> 
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2024-10-04 08:33:20-03:00)
> >On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com> wrote:
> >> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00)
> >>>#### Possible regressions ####
> >>>
> >>>  * igt at i915_selftest@live:
> >>>    - bat-mtlp-6:         [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
> >>>   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp-
> 6/igt at i915_selftest@live.html
> >>>   [2]:
> >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mtlp
> >>> -6/igt at i915_selftest@live.html
> >>
> >> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about
> >> tracepoints.
> >>
> >> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new CI
> >> cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable tracepoints. Or
> >> does it?
> >
> >BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions.
> 
> Okay. Thanks.
See original BAT results mail it says " If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes  
> introduced in Patchwork_137978v2, please notify your bug team > (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) 
to allow them  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI." 
> 
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
> 
> >
> >Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series
> >didn't cause the failures.
> >
> >
> >BR,
> >Jani.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jani Nikula, Intel