[linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)
Eric Biggers
ebiggers at kernel.org
Wed Oct 16 02:25:32 UTC 2024
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec
These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me. A negative
regression would be an improvement. But that is not actually what is meant.
Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.
- Eric
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list