[linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)
Oliver Sang
oliver.sang at intel.com
Wed Oct 16 05:50:12 UTC 2024
hi, Eric,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 07:25:32PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec
>
> These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me. A negative
> regression would be an improvement. But that is not actually what is meant.
>
> Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.
thanks for suggestion! we will refine wording in the future.
>
> - Eric
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list