[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Power request asserting/deasserting
Raag Jadav
raag.jadav at intel.com
Thu Oct 31 12:55:07 UTC 2024
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:40:26PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> There is a HW issue that arises when there are race conditions
> between TCSS entering/exiting TC7 or TC10 states while the
> driver is asserting/deasserting TCSS power request. As a
> workaround, Display driver will implement a mailbox sequence
> to ensure that the TCSS is in TC0 when TCSS power request is
> asserted/deasserted.
>
> The sequence is the following
>
> 1. Read mailbox command status and wait until run/busy bit is
> clear
> 2. Write mailbox data value '1' for power request asserting
> and '0' for power request deasserting
> 3. Write mailbox command run/busy bit and command value with 0x1
> 4. Read mailbox command and wait until run/busy bit is clear
> before continuing power request.
>
> v2: Rename WA function (Gustavo)
> Limit WA only for PTL platform with a TODO note (Gustavo)
> Add TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY for clarity when writing
> register data (Gustavo)
> Move register defs from i915_reg.h to intel_cx0_phy_regs.h (Gustavo)
> v3: use "struct intel_display" instead of "struct drm_i915_private" (Jani)
> Move defs above C10 definitions in the
> intel_cx0_phy_regs.h file (Gustavo)
> Move drm_WARN_ON() inside WA function (Gustavo)
> Rename workaround function as wa_14020908590() (Gustvo)
> Use boolean enable instead of if-else structure (Raag)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h | 8 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> index f0e5c196eae4..5a0b55cca4a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> @@ -200,6 +200,14 @@
> #define XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLA REG_BIT(1)
> #define XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLB REG_BIT(0)
>
> +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD _MMIO(0x161300)
> +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY REG_BIT(31)
> +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_CMD_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_DATA(val) (TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY | \
> + REG_FIELD_PREP(TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_CMD_MASK, val))
> +
> +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_DATA _MMIO(0x161304)
> +
> /* C10 Vendor Registers */
> #define PHY_C10_VDR_PLL(idx) (0xC00 + (idx))
> #define C10_PLL0_FRACEN REG_BIT8(4)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index b16c4d2d4077..dab2ac7ec0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -1013,6 +1013,31 @@ xelpdp_tc_phy_wait_for_tcss_power(struct intel_tc_port *tc, bool enabled)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static void wa_14020908590(struct intel_display *display,
> + bool enable)
Can be one line?
Raag
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list