[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Power request asserting/deasserting
Kahola, Mika
mika.kahola at intel.com
Thu Oct 31 14:29:16 UTC 2024
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jadav, Raag <raag.jadav at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2024 14.55
> To: Kahola, Mika <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>;
> jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Power request
> asserting/deasserting
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:40:26PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > There is a HW issue that arises when there are race conditions between
> > TCSS entering/exiting TC7 or TC10 states while the driver is
> > asserting/deasserting TCSS power request. As a workaround, Display
> > driver will implement a mailbox sequence to ensure that the TCSS is in
> > TC0 when TCSS power request is asserted/deasserted.
> >
> > The sequence is the following
> >
> > 1. Read mailbox command status and wait until run/busy bit is
> > clear
> > 2. Write mailbox data value '1' for power request asserting
> > and '0' for power request deasserting 3. Write mailbox command
> > run/busy bit and command value with 0x1 4. Read mailbox command and
> > wait until run/busy bit is clear
> > before continuing power request.
> >
> > v2: Rename WA function (Gustavo)
> > Limit WA only for PTL platform with a TODO note (Gustavo)
> > Add TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY for clarity when writing
> > register data (Gustavo)
> > Move register defs from i915_reg.h to intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> > (Gustavo)
> > v3: use "struct intel_display" instead of "struct drm_i915_private" (Jani)
> > Move defs above C10 definitions in the
> > intel_cx0_phy_regs.h file (Gustavo)
> > Move drm_WARN_ON() inside WA function (Gustavo)
> > Rename workaround function as wa_14020908590() (Gustvo)
> > Use boolean enable instead of if-else structure (Raag)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h | 8 +++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> > index f0e5c196eae4..5a0b55cca4a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> > @@ -200,6 +200,14 @@
> > #define XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLA REG_BIT(1)
> > #define XELPDP_SSC_ENABLE_PLLB REG_BIT(0)
> >
> > +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD _MMIO(0x161300)
> > +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY REG_BIT(31)
> > +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_CMD_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_DATA(val)
> (TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_RUN_BUSY | \
> > +
> REG_FIELD_PREP(TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_CMD_CMD_MASK, val))
> > +
> > +#define TCSS_DISP_MAILBOX_IN_DATA _MMIO(0x161304)
> > +
> > /* C10 Vendor Registers */
> > #define PHY_C10_VDR_PLL(idx) (0xC00 + (idx))
> > #define C10_PLL0_FRACEN REG_BIT8(4)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > index b16c4d2d4077..dab2ac7ec0dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > @@ -1013,6 +1013,31 @@ xelpdp_tc_phy_wait_for_tcss_power(struct
> intel_tc_port *tc, bool enabled)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static void wa_14020908590(struct intel_display *display,
> > + bool enable)
>
> Can be one line?
Could be. This should fit within expected line length.
>
> Raag
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list