[RESEND 3/6] drm/i915/wm: DG2 doesn't have dram info to look up wm_lv_0_adjust_needed

[Govindapillai, Vinod]

On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 16:33 +0300, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 12:25 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > There's no dram info on DG2 that we could use. The struct dram_info is
> > all zero on it, but be explicit about this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > index f5600f4b7772..817939f6d4dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > @@ -3251,7 +3251,7 @@ adjust_wm_latency(struct intel_display *display,
> >  	 * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm
> >  	 * to avoid any underrun.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)
> > +	if (!display->platform.dg2 && dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)
> 
> For Disp version >= 12, wm_lv_0_adjust_needed is hard coded to false. So I don't think this
> explicit
> DG2 check is needed here.. 
> 
> with that,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>

My bad! Pls ignore the above comments! RB-ed anyway.

BR
Vinod

> 
> 
> 
> >  		wm[0] += 1;
> >  }
> >  
>