[PATCH v4 03/21] drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_exec_time_us()

Shankar, Uma uma.shankar at intel.com
Tue Jun 10 21:32:19 UTC 2025



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 7:40 PM
> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH v4 03/21] drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_exec_time_us()
> 
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> Pull the magic 20 usec DSB execution deadline into
> intel_dsb_arm_exec_time_us(), and also add its counterapart for the non-arming

Nit: Typo in counterpart

Change Looks Good to me.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>

> register write section. For the non-arming part we'll just throw in a random 80 usec
> for now so the total is 100usec. The total exec time will be needed by the
> upcoming flip queue code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 8cbb5695c651..c8011f5e4076 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -686,14 +686,36 @@ static u32 dsb_error_int_en(struct intel_display
> *display)
>  	return errors;
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * FIXME calibrate these sensibly, ideally compute based on
> + * the number of regisetrs to be written. But that requires
> + * measuring the actual DSB execution speed on each platform
> + * (and the speed also depends on CDCLK and memory clock)...
> + */
> +static int intel_dsb_noarm_exec_time_us(void)
> +{
> +	return 80;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_dsb_arm_exec_time_us(void) {
> +	return 20;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_dsb_exec_time_us(void)
> +{
> +	return intel_dsb_noarm_exec_time_us() +
> +		intel_dsb_arm_exec_time_us();
> +}
> +
>  void intel_dsb_vblank_evade(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			    struct intel_dsb *dsb)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
>  		intel_pre_commit_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	/* FIXME calibrate sensibly */
> -	int latency = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode,
> 20);
> +	int latency = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode,
> +					       intel_dsb_arm_exec_time_us());
>  	int start, end;
> 
>  	/*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> index ab6489749866..6bcfb03f3415 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,  void intel_dsb_finish(struct intel_dsb *dsb);  void
> intel_dsb_gosub_finish(struct intel_dsb *dsb);  void intel_dsb_cleanup(struct
> intel_dsb *dsb);
> +int intel_dsb_exec_time_us(void);
>  void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb,
>  			 i915_reg_t reg, u32 val);
>  void intel_dsb_reg_write_indexed(struct intel_dsb *dsb,
> --
> 2.49.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list