[PATCH] drm/i915/ring_submission: Fix timeline left held on VMA alloc error

Janusz Krzysztofik janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 12 09:08:18 UTC 2025


On Wednesday, 11 June 2025 22:54:40 CEST Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Nitin,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:45:30PM +0000, Gote, Nitin R wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/ring_submission: Fix timeline left held on VMA alloc
> > > error
> > >
> > 
> > Generally, it's preferred to use "drm/i915/gt:" file path over "drm/i915/ring_submission:"  file name in the commit title.
> 
> good observation, I missed it. I agree with Nitin on this, it can
> be fixed before merging.

I'm not sure.  I found no single word on the *subsystem* component of the 
canonical patch format subject line (or commit message) expected to reflect 
any directory structure in case of DRM.  However, if you think it should for 
some reason, or you just don't recognize i915 ring submission as a good 
candidate for the subsystem component of the commit message, then I'm OK with 
drm/i915/gt, but then, the summary phrase of the commit message seems too 
general for the whole GT subsystem, not pointing to ring submission as the 
only submission method out of the three that's affected, and needs to be 
rephrased, I believe, while still kept short enough.  Maybe "Fix *legacy* 
timeline held on VMA alloc error" (with the 'left' word dropped)?

Thanks,
Janusz

> 
> Andi
> 






More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list