[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/execlist: Remove leftover printk messages
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Wed Jul 19 15:28:43 UTC 2023
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 01:51:07PM +0000, Francois Dugast wrote:
> Those look like leftover debug and are not even being used. If they were
> real debug/info, they should be using the drm helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> index 46293c9bb6a8..3aec37985f32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ static void __start_lrc(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_lrc *lrc,
> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> u64 lrc_desc;
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "__start_lrc(%s, 0x%p, %u)\n", hwe->name, lrc, ctx_id);
> -
> lrc_desc = xe_lrc_descriptor(lrc);
>
> if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1250) {
> @@ -125,9 +123,6 @@ static void __xe_execlist_port_idle(struct xe_execlist_port *port)
> if (!port->running_exl)
> return;
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "__xe_execlist_port_idle(%d:%d)\n", port->hwe->class,
> - port->hwe->instance);
> -
> xe_lrc_write_ring(&port->hwe->kernel_lrc, noop, sizeof(noop));
> __start_lrc(port->hwe, &port->hwe->kernel_lrc, 0);
> port->running_exl = NULL;
> @@ -176,9 +171,6 @@ static u64 read_execlist_status(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
> lo = xe_mmio_read32(gt, RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_LO(hwe->mmio_base));
> hi = xe_mmio_read32(gt, RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_HI(hwe->mmio_base));
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "EXECLIST_STATUS %d:%d = 0x%08x %08x\n", hwe->class,
> - hwe->instance, hi, lo);
This one is indeed annoying when it happens, so we need to get rid of,
but I believe we need to have at least a big drm_info somewhere to let us
know that execlist is in place. Probably at execlist_engine_init ?!
> -
> return lo | (u64)hi << 32;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list