[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/10] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support

[Lucas De Marchi]

From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>

drm/xe: Fix bo refcounting in intel_framebuffer

Seems we have various confused refcounting mechanisms.
intel_frontbuffer.c was holding a reference on the bo, but it should be
handled in the framebuffer.

A few rebases before, there was code that explicitly adds a refcount in
intel_fb_init, but chunks of that have disappeared. The changes in
xe_plane_initial are reminders of it.

By adding a refcount, we match how drm_gem_framebuffer_helper handles
things. In i915, this is opaquely (and accidentally?) handled through
intel_frontbuffer_get(), not going to duplicate that mistake in xe.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c          | 10 +++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c |  4 ----
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c    |  5 ++---
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
index e2b400318b31..e0bac4cf3f4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
@@ -1895,7 +1895,8 @@ static void intel_user_framebuffer_destroy_vm(struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
 		xe_bo_lock_no_vm(bo, NULL);
 		xe_bo_unpin(bo);
 		xe_bo_unlock_no_vm(bo);
-        }
+	}
+	xe_bo_put(intel_fb_obj(fb));
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -1905,10 +1906,10 @@ static void intel_user_framebuffer_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb)
 
 	drm_framebuffer_cleanup(fb);
 
-	intel_user_framebuffer_destroy_vm(fb);
-
 	intel_frontbuffer_put(intel_fb->frontbuffer);
 
+	intel_user_framebuffer_destroy_vm(fb);
+
 	kfree(intel_fb);
 }
 
@@ -2125,6 +2126,9 @@ int intel_framebuffer_init(struct intel_framebuffer *intel_fb,
 
 		intel_fb->dpt_vm = vm;
 	}
+#else
+	/* Hold a reference to object while fb is alive */
+	xe_bo_get(obj);
 #endif
 
 	ret = drm_framebuffer_init(&dev_priv->drm, fb, &intel_fb_funcs);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
index 64fdc7880381..15d414ed0d73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
@@ -256,8 +256,6 @@ static void frontbuffer_release(struct kref *ref)
 	i915_active_fini(&front->write);
 
 	i915_gem_object_put(obj);
-#else
-	xe_bo_get(obj);
 #endif
 	kfree_rcu(front, rcu);
 }
@@ -300,8 +298,6 @@ intel_frontbuffer_get(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 		rcu_assign_pointer(obj->frontbuffer, front);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&i915->display.fb_tracking.lock);
-#else
-	xe_bo_get(obj);
 #endif
 
 	return front;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
index 37cba91be10d..6695908024d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_plane_initial.c
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "intel fb init failed\n");
 		goto err_bo;
 	}
+	/* Reference handed over to fb */
+	xe_bo_put(bo);
 
 	return true;
 
@@ -263,9 +265,6 @@ static void plane_config_fini(struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
 		else
 			kfree(fb);
 	}
-
-	if (plane_config->vma)
-		drm_gem_object_put(&plane_config->vma->bo->ttm.base);
 }
 
 void intel_crtc_initial_plane_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
-- 
2.40.1