[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error

[Thomas Hellström]

Hi, Christian,

Will you take a look at 2/4 as well? Will you merge these?

Thanks,

Thomas


On 6/26/23 13:33, Christian König wrote:
> Am 26.06.23 um 11:14 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
>> If moving the bo to system for swapout failed, we were leaking
>> a resource. Fix.
>>
>> Fixes: bfa3357ef9ab ("drm/ttm: allocate resource object instead of 
>> embedding it v2")
>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> Cc: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v5.14+
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> index c0e3bbd21d3d..d9a8f227f310 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> @@ -1166,6 +1166,7 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object 
>> *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>>           ret = ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(bo, evict_mem, true, ctx, &hop);
>>           if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
>>               WARN(ret == -EMULTIHOP, "Unexpected multihop in swaput 
>> - likely driver bug.\n");
>> +            ttm_resource_free(bo, &evict_mem);
>>               goto out;
>>           }
>>       }
>