June 2023 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Jun 1 00:03:32 UTC 2023
Ending: Fri Jun 30 23:40:54 UTC 2023
Messages: 1861

• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 00/31] Separate GT and tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 01/31] drm/xe/mtl: Disable media GT   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 01/31] drm/xe/mtl: Disable media GT   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Ofir Bitton
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Ofir Bitton
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 03/31] drm/xe: Add backpointer from gt to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 04/31] fixup! drm/xe: keep pulling mem_access_get further back   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 05/31] drm/xe: Add for_each_tile iterator   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 05/31] drm/xe: Add for_each_tile iterator   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 06/31] drm/xe: Move register MMIO into xe_tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 07/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 08/31] drm/xe: Move GGTT from GT to tile   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 08/31] drm/xe: Move GGTT from GT to tile   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 09/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 11/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 12/31] drm/xe: Memory allocations are tile-based, not GT-based   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 13/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 14/31] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 14/31] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 15/31] drm/xe: Clarify 'gt' retrieval for primary tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 16/31] drm/xe: Drop vram_id   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 17/31] drm/xe: Drop extra_gts[] declarations and XE_GT_TYPE_REMOTE   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 18/31] drm/xe: Allocate GT dynamically   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 19/31] drm/xe: Add media GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 20/31] drm/xe: Move display IRQ postinstall out of GT function   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 21/31] drm/xe: Interrupts are delivered per-tile, not per-GT   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 21/31] drm/xe: Interrupts are delivered per-tile, not per-GT   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 22/31] drm/xe/irq: Handle ASLE backlight interrupts at same time as display   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 23/31] drm/xe/irq: Ensure primary GuC won't clobber media GuC's interrupt mask   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 24/31] drm/xe/irq: Untangle postinstall functions   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 25/31] drm/xe: Replace xe_gt_irq_postinstall with xe_irq_enable_hwe   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 26/31] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB on all affected GTs during GGTT updates   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 27/31] drm/xe/tlb: Obtain forcewake when doing GGTT TLB invalidations   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 28/31] drm/xe: Allow GT looping and lookup on standalone media   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 28/31] drm/xe: Allow GT looping and lookup on standalone media   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Welty, Brian
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4.1 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4.1 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Welty, Brian
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 30/31] drm/xe: Reinstate media GT support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 31/31] drm/xe: Add kerneldoc description of multi-tile devices   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Separate GT and tile (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Separate GT and tile (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for Separate GT and tile (rev6)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile   Jani Nikula
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/8] drm/xe/display: Call display probe from i915 code   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/8] drm/xe/display: Call display probe from i915 code   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/8] drm/xe/display: Call display probe from i915 code   Jani Nikula
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Oded Gabbay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Oded Gabbay
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Oded Gabbay
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Oded Gabbay
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: Clear the buffer object bulk move at individualize time   Christian König
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Maarten Lankhorst
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/vm: fix double list add   Maarten Lankhorst
• [Intel-xe] Code review for Xe driver - Second batch of comments (1/6)   Oded Gabbay
  • [Intel-xe] Code review for Xe driver - Second batch of comments (1/6)   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace PVC check by engine type check   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace PVC check by engine type check   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace PVC check by engine type check   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 14/31] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile   Gustavo Sousa
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Replace DRM_ERROR() with drm_err()   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR   Jani Nikula
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add missing TLB invalidation to emit_pipe_invalidate()   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add missing TLB invalidation to emit_pipe_invalidate()   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add missing TLB invalidation to emit_pipe_invalidate()   Lionel Landwerlin
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR() (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR() (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR() (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR() (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Replace deprecated DRM_ERROR()   Gustavo Sousa
• [Intel-xe] [CI 00/31] Separate GT and tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 01/31] drm/xe/mtl: Disable media GT   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 03/31] drm/xe: Add backpointer from gt to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 04/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 05/31] drm/xe: Add for_each_tile iterator   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 06/31] drm/xe: Move register MMIO into xe_tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 07/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 08/31] drm/xe: Move GGTT from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 09/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [CI 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 11/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 12/31] drm/xe: Memory allocations are tile-based, not GT-based   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 13/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 14/31] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 15/31] drm/xe: Clarify 'gt' retrieval for primary tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 16/31] drm/xe: Drop vram_id   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 17/31] drm/xe: Drop extra_gts[] declarations and XE_GT_TYPE_REMOTE   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 18/31] drm/xe: Allocate GT dynamically   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 19/31] drm/xe: Add media GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 20/31] drm/xe: Move display IRQ postinstall out of GT function   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 21/31] drm/xe: Interrupts are delivered per-tile, not per-GT   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 22/31] drm/xe/irq: Handle ASLE backlight interrupts at same time as display   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 23/31] drm/xe/irq: Ensure primary GuC won't clobber media GuC's interrupt mask   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 24/31] drm/xe/irq: Untangle postinstall functions   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 25/31] drm/xe: Replace xe_gt_irq_postinstall with xe_irq_enable_hwe   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 26/31] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB on all affected GTs during GGTT updates   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 27/31] drm/xe/tlb: Obtain forcewake when doing GGTT TLB invalidations   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 28/31] drm/xe: Allow GT looping and lookup on standalone media   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 30/31] drm/xe: Reinstate media GT support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 31/31] drm/xe: Add kerneldoc description of multi-tile devices   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Separate GT and tile (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Separate GT and tile (rev7)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [CIv2 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [CIv2 00/31] Separate GT and tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 01/31] drm/xe/mtl: Disable media GT   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 03/31] drm/xe: Add backpointer from gt to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 04/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 05/31] drm/xe: Add for_each_tile iterator   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 06/31] drm/xe: Move register MMIO into xe_tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 07/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 08/31] drm/xe: Move GGTT from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 09/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 10/31] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 11/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 12/31] drm/xe: Memory allocations are tile-based, not GT-based   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 13/31] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 14/31] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 15/31] drm/xe: Clarify 'gt' retrieval for primary tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 16/31] drm/xe: Drop vram_id   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 17/31] drm/xe: Drop extra_gts[] declarations and XE_GT_TYPE_REMOTE   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 18/31] drm/xe: Allocate GT dynamically   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 19/31] drm/xe: Add media GT to tile   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 20/31] drm/xe: Move display IRQ postinstall out of GT function   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 21/31] drm/xe: Interrupts are delivered per-tile, not per-GT   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 22/31] drm/xe/irq: Handle ASLE backlight interrupts at same time as display   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 23/31] drm/xe/irq: Ensure primary GuC won't clobber media GuC's interrupt mask   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 24/31] drm/xe/irq: Untangle postinstall functions   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 25/31] drm/xe: Replace xe_gt_irq_postinstall with xe_irq_enable_hwe   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 26/31] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB on all affected GTs during GGTT updates   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 27/31] drm/xe/tlb: Obtain forcewake when doing GGTT TLB invalidations   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 28/31] drm/xe: Allow GT looping and lookup on standalone media   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 29/31] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support standalone media   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 30/31] drm/xe: Reinstate media GT support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [CIv2 31/31] drm/xe: Add kerneldoc description of multi-tile devices   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile (rev8)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Separate GT and tile (rev8)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Separate GT and tile (rev8)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Separate GT and tile (rev8)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [CIv2 02/31] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Apply upper limit to sg element size   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per gt memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per gt memory size   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per gt memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per gt memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per gt memory size   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Andi Shyti
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Andi Shyti
• [Intel-xe] Render cache flushes WAS drm/xe: Add missing TLB invalidation to emit_pipe_invalidate()   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 00/10] Clean-up Xe FBC additions   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 01/10] Revert "drm/i915/display: Make FBC check stolen at use time."   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 02/10] Revert "drm/i915/fbc: set compressed_fb to NULL on error"   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 03/10] Revert "drm/i915/display: Implement FBC support"   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 04/10] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/i915: Move stolen memory handling into i915_gem_stolen   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/xe: Xe stolen memory handling for fbc support   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/xe: Add i915_gem.h compatibility header   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/i915/fbc: Make FBC check stolen at use time   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/i915/fbc: Moved fence related code away from intel_fbc   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/xe: Add Xe implementation for fence checks used by fbc code   Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Clean-up Xe FBC additions (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Zbigniew Kempczyński
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Zbigniew Kempczyński
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for tests/xe/xe_intel_bb: ensure valid next page (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 0/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC, 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Ohad Sharabi
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC, 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Ohad Sharabi
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC, 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Francois Dugast
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC, 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Ohad Sharabi
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Francois Dugast
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Oded Gabbay
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Oded Gabbay
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Oded Gabbay
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Introduce function pointers for MMIO functions   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Mika Kuoppala
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Mika Kuoppala
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Get the engine ref while holding a lock   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Mika Kuoppala
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Fix unreffed ptr leak on engine lookup   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] drm/xe: replace commits with upstream backports   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Flush power delayed put when connector init failed   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Remove i915_drm_suspend_mode"   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Remove i915_drm_suspend_mode   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915/display: Fix a use-after-free when intel_edp_init_connector fails"   Jani Nikula
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Hellstrom, Thomas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Use large rings for compute contexts   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Alan Previn
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v1] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [v1] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
    • [Intel-xe] [v1] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/wa: Extend scope of Wa_14015795083   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Initialize MOCS earlier   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Initialize MOCS earlier   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Don't hardcode GuC's MOCS index in register header   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Don't hardcode GuC's MOCS index in register header   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Reformat xe_guc_regs.h   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem   Tomer Tayar
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem   Alex Deucher
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem   Sebastian Wick
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/5] drm/netlink: Add netlink infrastructure   Tomer Tayar
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/5] drm/netlink: Add netlink infrastructure   Iddamsetty, Aravind
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/5] drm/netlink: Add netlink infrastructure   Tomer Tayar
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/5] drm/netlink: Add netlink infrastructure   Iddamsetty, Aravind
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/5] drm/xe/RAS: Register a genl netlink family   Tomer Tayar
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/5] drm/xe/RAS: Register a genl netlink family   Iddamsetty, Aravind
• [Intel-xe] [RFC i-g-t 1/1] tools/RAS: A tool to read error counters   Tomer Tayar
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC i-g-t 1/1] tools/RAS: A tool to read error counters   Iddamsetty, Aravind
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Do not disable rc6 in s2idle   Belgaumkar, Vinay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Do not disable rc6 in s2idle   Gupta, Anshuman
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Nilawar, Badal
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/1] drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Michael J. Ruhl
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: REBAR resize should be best effort   Michael J. Ruhl
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: REBAR resize should be best effort   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: REBAR resize should be best effort   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: REBAR resize should be best effort   Ruhl, Michael J
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Rebar resize should not fail probe   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Mauro Carvalho Chehab
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v2,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Sujaritha Sundaresan
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Dixit, Ashutosh
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Sundaresan, Sujaritha
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Dixit, Ashutosh
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] [RFC]drm/xe: Sysfs entries to query fused min, max frequency of lmem   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Dixit, Ashutosh
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Souza, Jose
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Report tile count from device query api.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry per tile   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry per tile   Iddamsetty, Aravind
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry per tile   Upadhyay, Tejas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry per tile   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry per tile   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Iddamsetty, Aravind
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/pt: limit PS64 where supported   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add HWMON support for DGFX   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add HWMON support for DGFX   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Nilawar, Badal
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose input voltage attribute   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose input voltage attribute   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose hwmon energy attribute   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose hwmon energy attribute   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power1_max_interval   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power1_max_interval   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for Add HWMON support for DGFX   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 0/5] uAPI bits for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/xe/uapi: restrict system wide accounting   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/xe/uapi: add some kernel-doc for region query   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/xe/bo: support tiered vram allocation for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/xe/uapi: add the userspace bits for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe: fully turn on small-bar support   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev6)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   José Roberto de Souza
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Shankar, Uma
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Ville Syrjälä
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Append dma_buf fences to framebuffer fences   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/10] Utilize i915 display probing   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915: Convert INTEL_INFO()->display to a pointer   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/display: Move display runtime info to display structure   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/i915/display: Make display responsible for probing its own IP   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/display: Handle GMD_ID identification in display code   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/display: Move feature test macros to intel_display_device.h   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/display: Include of display limits doesn't need 'display/'   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/display: Include of display limits doesn't need 'display/'   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/display: Include of display limits doesn't need 'display/'   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/i915: Fix error handling if driver creation fails during probe   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/i915/display: Extract display init from intel_device_info_runtime_init   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/10] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/10] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/10] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Utilize i915 display probing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/10] Utilize i915 display probing   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/display: Move display device info to header under display/   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe: Use SPDX-License-Identifier instead of license text   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe: Group engine related structs   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe: Move defines before relevant fields   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe: Fix some formatting issues in uAPI   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe: Fix some formatting issues in uAPI   Francois Dugast
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Document usage of struct drm_xe_device_query   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Nilawar, Badal
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Iddamsetty, Aravind
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/5] D3Cold Policy   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/xe/pm: Add pci d3cold_capable support   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/xe/pm: Refactor xe_pm_runtime_init   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold Sysfs   Anshuman Gupta
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold Sysfs   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/xe/pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold Sysfs   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/5] xe/drm/pm: Toggle d3cold_allowed using vram_usages   Anshuman Gupta
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/5] xe/drm/pm: Toggle d3cold_allowed using vram_usages   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/pm: Init pcode and restore vram on power lost   Anshuman Gupta
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/pm: Init pcode and restore vram on power lost   Nilawar, Badal
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe/pm: Init pcode and restore vram on power lost   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for D3Cold Policy (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for D3Cold Policy (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for D3Cold Policy (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for D3Cold Policy (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for D3Cold Policy (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP   janga.rahul.kumar at intel.com
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP   janga.rahul.kumar at intel.com
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/8] Scheduler changes for upstreaming   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/8] fixup! drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/8] fixup! drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/8] fixup! drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/xe: Use DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY mode   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/xe: Ensure LR engines are not persistent   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/xe: Only try to lock external BOs in VM bind   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/xe: Only try to lock external BOs in VM bind   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] Implement rcs/ccs missing invalidations and flushes   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Emit a render cache flush after each rcs/ccs batch   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Emit a render cache flush after each rcs/ccs batch   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Implement rcs/ccs missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Implement rcs/ccs missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for Implement rcs/ccs missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] Implement rcs/ccs missing invalidations and flushes   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs   Ashutosh Dixit
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for NULL bindings aka sparse bindings (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: s/XE_PTE_READ_ONLY/XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: s/XE_PTE_READ_ONLY/XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: s/XE_PTE_READ_ONLY/XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Move XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY to xe_vm_types.h   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Move XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY to xe_vm_types.h   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Move XE_PTE_FLAG_READ_ONLY to xe_vm_types.h   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Welty, Brian
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Zanoni, Paulo R
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Zanoni, Paulo R
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Zanoni, Paulo R
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Upadhyay, Tejas
• [Intel-xe] [RFC] drm/xe/pm: d3cold policy   Gupta, Anshuman
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/Xe: Use ENOTSUP instead of ENOTSUPP   janga.rahul.kumar at intel.com
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/Xe: Use ENOTSUP instead of ENOTSUPP   Iddamsetty, Aravind
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/Xe: Use ENOTSUP instead of ENOTSUPP   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: Document structures for device query   Francois Dugast
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: Move defines before relevant fields   Francois Dugast
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/2] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug support   Andi Shyti
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/2] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce discovery for resources   Andi Shyti
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/mtl: Add some initial MTL workarounds   Sripada, Radhakrishna
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/31] drm/xe/guc: Use doorbells for submission if possible   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/31] drm/xe/guc: Use doorbells for submission if possible   Oded Gabbay
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] GuC doorbells for submission   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Return the lower part of blocking H2G message   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Use doorbells for submission if possible   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/guc: Print doorbell ID in GuC engine debugfs / error capture   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for GuC doorbells for submission   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Donot apply forcewake while reading actual frequency (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 01/10] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Boris Brezillon
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/xe: Document structures for device query   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/xe: Move defines before relevant fields   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB also on bind if in scratch page mode   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Emit a render cache flush after each rcs/ccs batch   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Implement missing invalidations and flushes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] Implement missing invalidations and flushes   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Use a single parameter for xe_reg_sr_apply_whitelist()   Gustavo Sousa
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Use a single parameter for xe_reg_sr_apply_whitelist()   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting   Gustavo Sousa
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe/reg_sr: Apply limit to register whitelisting   Gustavo Sousa
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] A rebind fixes   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Handle unmapped userptr in analyze VM   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Handle unmapped userptr in analyze VM   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Handle unmapped userptr in analyze VM   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Use Xe ordered workqueue for rebind worker   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Use Xe ordered workqueue for rebind worker   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Use Xe ordered workqueue for rebind worker   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for A rebind fixes   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Souza, Jose
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/1] Fix stolen memory size calculation   Aravind Iddamsetty
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Fix stolen memory size calculation   Aravind Iddamsetty
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Fix stolen memory size calculation   Ruhl, Michael J
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Fix stolen memory size calculation   Iddamsetty, Aravind
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Fix stolen memory size calculation   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Fix stolen memory size calculation   Ruhl, Michael J
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Fix stolen memory size calculation   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/3] drm/xe: Add CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/3] drm/xe: Add DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_COMPUTE   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 3/3] drm/xe: Add DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_COMPUTE_COPY   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe/guc: Fix typo s/enabled/enable/   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe/guc: Fix typo s/enabled/enable/   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe/guc: Normalize error messages with %#x   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe/guc: Normalize error messages with %#x   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe: Fix GMD_ID to revid   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe: Fix GMD_ID to revid   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: Rename pte/pde encoding functions   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 00/12] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 01/12] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 02/12] drm/xe/vm: tidy up xe_runtime_pm usage   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 03/12] drm/xe/debugfs: grab mem_access around forcewake   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 05/12] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 05/12] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 06/12] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 06/12] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 07/12] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 08/12] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 08/12] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 09/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from guc_ct_send   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 10/12] drm/xe/ggtt: prime ggtt->lock against FS_RECLAIM   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 11/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 11/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get()   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get()   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get()   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get()   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] Add gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Nilawar, Badal
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Gupta, Anshuman
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Riana Tauro
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Nilawar, Badal
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for Add gtidle properties   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe : Fix GT looping for standalone media   Riana Tauro
• [Intel-xe] [CI] drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Always flush TLB on rebind.   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Anusha Srivatsa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing ADL entries to xe_test_wa   Anusha Srivatsa
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing ADL entries to xe_test_wa   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Anusha Srivatsa
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add missing ADL entries to xe_test_wa   Anusha Srivatsa
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/kunit: Handle fake device creation for all platform/subplatform cases   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Fix GMD_ID to revid   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Skip applying copy engine fuses   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/2] Add mmio register rw tracing   Radhakrishna Sripada
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/2] drm/xe: Move mmio read/write functions to xe_mmio.c   Radhakrishna Sripada
    • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/2] drm/xe: Move mmio read/write functions to xe_mmio.c   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/2] drm/xe: Move mmio read/write functions to xe_mmio.c   Sripada, Radhakrishna
  • [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Radhakrishna Sripada
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add mmio register rw tracing   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Grab runtime PM over MMIO ioctl   Matthew Auld
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] GMD_ID fixes   Matt Roper
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Return GMD_ID revid properly   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Return GMD_ID revid properly   Gustavo Sousa
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Return GMD_ID revid properly   Gustavo Sousa
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Return GMD_ID revid properly   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Don't raise error on fused-off media   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Don't raise error on fused-off media   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Print proper revid value for unknown media revision   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Print proper revid value for unknown media revision   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Enable PCI device earlier   Matt Roper
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Enable PCI device earlier   Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for GMD_ID fixes   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: limit GGTT size to GUC_GGTT_TOP   Matthew Auld
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Francois Dugast
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs entries for engines under its GT   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe: Add job timeout engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: Add timeslice duration engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for preempt reset timeout   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Andy Shevchenko
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Andy Shevchenko
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Jani Nikula
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Andy Shevchenko
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Andy Shevchenko
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Yury Norov
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] linux/bits.h: Add fixed-width GENMASK and BIT macros   Yury Norov
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/8] Scheduler changes for upstreaming   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/xe: Use DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY mode   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe: Long running job update   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/xe: Ensure LR engines are not persistent   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/xe: Only try to lock external BOs in VM bind   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Scheduler changes for upstreaming (rev5)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/8] fixup! drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/8] fixup! drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation   Zanoni, Paulo R
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Andi Shyti
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Gustavo Sousa
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Riana Tauro
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Andi Shyti
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Nilawar, Badal
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Riana Tauro
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add gtidle properties (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] Xe runtime pm fixes   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Anshuman Gupta
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pm: Wrap pm_runtime_suspended with power.lock   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/pm: Fix PM runtime_idle callback   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Xe runtime pm fixes   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Aravind Iddamsetty
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Get GT clock to nanosecs   Aravind Iddamsetty
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Aravind Iddamsetty
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/6] uAPI bits for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/xe/bo: consider bo->flags in xe_bo_migrate()   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/xe/bo: consider bo->flags in xe_bo_migrate()   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/xe/uapi: restrict system wide accounting   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/xe/uapi: add some kernel-doc for region query   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 4/6] drm/xe/bo: support tiered vram allocation for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/xe/uapi: add the userspace bits for small-bar   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/xe: fully turn on small-bar support   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for uAPI bits for small-bar (rev7)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/6] uAPI bits for small-bar   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/6] uAPI bits for small-bar   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/bo: Don't limit the TT manager to half of system memory   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add mmio register rw tracing   Radhakrishna Sripada
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Move mmio read/write functions to xe_mmio.c   Radhakrishna Sripada
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Radhakrishna Sripada
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Sripada, Radhakrishna
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Matt Roper
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Sripada, Radhakrishna
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add reg read/write trace   Sripada, Radhakrishna
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add mmio register rw tracing (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/1] User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Danilo Krummrich
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   kernel test robot
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix intel_display_irq.c include order   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/irq: split out display irq handling   Matt Roper
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/2] Add gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add gtidle properties (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Introduce a module parameter to control IAF   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerator fabric driver   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Fixed-width mask/bit helpers (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 1/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 2/3] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 3/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V4 0/3] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Upadhyay, Tejas
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/ttm: Fix ttm_lru_bulk_move_pos_tail()   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/ttm: Fix ttm_lru_bulk_move_pos_tail()   Nirmoy Das
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/ttm: Fix ttm_lru_bulk_move_pos_tail()   Christian König
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Nirmoy Das
    • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Andi Shyti
      • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Christian König
      • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Nirmoy Das
    • [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 0/3] drm/xe: uAPI cleanup   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Document structures for device query   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Document structures for device query   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe: Move defines before relevant fields   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe: Move defines before relevant fields   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe: Document topology mask query   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe: Document topology mask query   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: uAPI cleanup (rev5)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Alan Previn
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/xe: Introduce a module parameter to control IAF   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerator fabric driver   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Paulo Zanoni
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()   Paulo Zanoni
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Zanoni, Paulo R
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: check for negative 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC] drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/pvc: Disable FPU Residue   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/xe: Introduce a module parameter to control IAF   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   David Kershner
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   Ofir Bitton
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   Ruhl, Michael J
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   Ofir Bitton
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerated Fabric device   Ruhl, Michael J
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe: Introduce Intel Accelerator fabric driver   David Kershner
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add Intel Accelerated Fabric to Xe (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Himal Prasad Ghimiray
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v5,1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/xe: Add a debugfs for faking gt reset failure.   Francois Dugast
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/2] Add gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/xe: add a new sysfs directory for gtidle properties   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/xe/mtl: Add support to get C6 residency/status of MTL   Riana Tauro
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Add gtidle properties (rev5)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/doc: include xe_drm.h   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [RFC] drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/pvc: Force even num engines to use 64B   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/doc: include xe_drm.h   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/doc: include xe_drm.h   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Francois Dugast
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe/uapi: silence kernel-doc errors   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 0/1] User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/ttm: Fix ttm_lru_bulk_move_pos_tail()   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/ttm: Fix ttm_lru_bulk_move_pos_tail()   Christian König
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Christian König
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/ttm: Don't shadow the operation context   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Andi Shyti
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on eviction error   Christian König
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Christian König
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/ttm: Don't leak a resource on swapout move error   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/ttm: Fixes around resources and bulk moves   Thomas Hellström
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 0/6] drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 1/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs entries for engines under its GT   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 1/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs entries for engines under its GT   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 1/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs entries for engines under its GT   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 3/6] drm/xe: Add job timeout engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 4/6] drm/xe: Add timeslice duration engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 5/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for preempt reset timeout   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V2 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 01/13] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 01/13] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 02/13] drm/xe/vm: tidy up xe_runtime_pm usage   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 03/13] drm/xe/debugfs: grab mem_access around forcewake   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 04/13] drm/xe/guc_pc: add missing mem_access for freq_rpe_show   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 04/13] drm/xe/guc_pc: add missing mem_access for freq_rpe_show   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 04/13] drm/xe/guc_pc: add missing mem_access for freq_rpe_show   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 04/13] drm/xe/guc_pc: add missing mem_access for freq_rpe_show   Gupta, Anshuman
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 05/13] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 06/13] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 07/13] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 08/13] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath   Matthew Auld
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 08/13] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath   Gupta, Anshuman
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 08/13] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 09/13] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 10/13] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from guc_ct_send   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 11/13] drm/xe/ggtt: prime ggtt->lock against FS_RECLAIM   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 12/13] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 13/13] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get()   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Dixit, Ashutosh
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v12 00/13] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits   Dixit, Ashutosh
• [Intel-xe] [CI 1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 2/4] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 3/4] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [CI 4/4] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Zbigniew Kempczyński
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/bo: Return object bo size on create   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/mmio: update gt_count when probing multi-tile (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/xe/bo: Fix swapin when moving to VRAM   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/bo: Avoid creating a system resource when allocating a fresh VRAM bo   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/xe/bo: Gracefully handle errors from ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup().   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Eviction fixes and optimizations (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Paulo Zanoni
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()   Paulo Zanoni
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()   Zanoni, Paulo R
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2,v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Zanoni, Paulo R
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2 v2] drm/xe: fix bounds checking for 'len' in xe_engine_create_ioctl   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/5] xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Lucas De Marchi
      • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Knop, Ryszard
      • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Jani Nikula
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/5] D3Cold Policy   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe/pm: Add pci d3cold_capable support   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe/pm: Refactor xe_pm_runtime_init   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe/pm: Add vram_d3cold_threshold Sysfs   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/5] xe/drm/pm: Toggle d3cold_allowed using vram_usages   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe/pm: Init pcode and restore vram on power lost   Anshuman Gupta
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for D3Cold Policy (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for D3Cold Policy (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for D3Cold Policy (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for D3Cold Policy (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for D3Cold Policy (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Aravind Iddamsetty
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Get GT clock to nanosecs   Aravind Iddamsetty
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Aravind Iddamsetty
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/1] User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 1/1] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/xe: Notify Userspace when engine/gt reset fails.   Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/6] Add HWMON support for DGFX   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add HWMON support for DGFX (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Add HWMON infrastructure   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Matthew Brost
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power attributes   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Nilawar, Badal
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose card reactive critical power   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose input voltage attribute   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose input voltage attribute   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose hwmon energy attribute   Badal Nilawar
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose hwmon energy attribute   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/xe/hwmon: Expose power1_max_interval   Badal Nilawar
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Add HWMON support for DGFX (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for Add HWMON support for DGFX (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Lucas De Marchi
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: fix HuC FW ordering for DG1   Lucas De Marchi
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Belgaumkar, Vinay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/slpc: Start SLPC before GuC submission on reset   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v7 0/1] User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds   Zbigniew Kempczyński
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v7 1/1] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Zbigniew Kempczyński
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v7 1/1] drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence   Andi Shyti
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for User fence wait uAPI change to nanoseconds (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 0/4] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 1/4] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 2/4] drm/xe: Add GTs under respective tile sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 3/4] drm/xe: Add sysfs entry to report per tile memory size   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 4/4] drm/xe: Make usable size of VRAM readable   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 4/4] drm/xe: Make usable size of VRAM readable   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V5 4/4] drm/xe: Make usable size of VRAM readable   Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Add sysfs entry for tile and relate it to GTs (rev5)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 0/6] drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 0/6] drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Upadhyay, Tejas
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 0/6] drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface   Dandamudi, Priyanka
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 1/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs entries for engines under its GT   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 2/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for default engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 3/6] drm/xe: Add job timeout engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 4/6] drm/xe: Add timeslice duration engine property to sysfs   Tejas Upadhyay
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 5/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for preempt reset timeout   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 5/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for preempt reset timeout   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 5/6] drm/xe: Add sysfs for preempt reset timeout   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Tejas Upadhyay
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Niranjana Vishwanathapura
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH V3 6/6] drm/xe: Add min/max cap for engine scheduler properties   Upadhyay, Tejas
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure for drm/xe: Add engine scheduler control interface (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Francois Dugast
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Thomas Hellström
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] Documentation/gpu: Add a VM_BIND async draft document   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Alan Previn
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Matthew Brost
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN   Alan Previn
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
    • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe/guc: Fix h2g_write usage of GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN (rev4)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/9] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/9] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/9] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/9] drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Remove __xe_vm_bind forward declaration   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Avoid doing rebinds   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe: Add helpers to hide struct xe_vma internals   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/8] GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/xe: Add helpers to hide struct xe_vma internals   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/8] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 4/8] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 6/8] drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/xe: Remove __xe_vm_bind forward declaration   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/9] GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/9] drm/xe: Add helpers to hide struct xe_vma internals   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/9] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/9] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 6/9] drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 7/9] drm/xe: Remove __xe_vm_bind forward declaration   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 9/9] drm/xe: Avoid doing rebinds   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev3)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Build: failure for GPUVA with no uAPI changes (rev3)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/9] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/9] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Make page-table updates using the default engine happen in order   Thomas Hellström
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Make page-table updates using the default engine happen in order   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Fix the separate bind-engine race using coarse-granularity dependencies   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: Fix two bind races   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] ttm_bo and multiple backing store segments   Welty, Brian
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH DONTMERGE] drm/xe: uapi review submission   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: uapi review submission   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH DONTMERGE] drm/xe: uapi review submission   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH DONTMERGE] drm/xe: uapi review submission   Dixit, Ashutosh
• [Intel-xe] xe & i915 display integration, display irqs   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [RESEND 1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [RESEND 2/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [RESEND 3/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [RESEND 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] [RESEND 5/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support   Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915/uncore: add intel_uncore_regs() helper   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Souza, Jose
• [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH] Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Thomas Hellström
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for Documentation/gpu: Draft VM_BIND locking document   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Matthew Auld
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Souza, Jose
    • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Matthew Auld
      • [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path   Souza, Jose
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for drm/xe: handle TLB invalidations from CT fast-path (rev2)   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/9] GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Matthew Brost
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: success for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
  • [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for GPUVA with no uAPI changes   Patchwork
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/xe: Ban a VM if rebind worker hits an error   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/xe: Add helpers to hide struct xe_vma internals   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/9] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 4/9] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 5/9] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 6/9] drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/xe: Remove __xe_vm_bind forward declaration   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA   Matthew Brost
• [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/xe: Avoid doing rebinds   Matthew Brost

Last message date: Fri Jun 30 23:40:54 UTC 2023
Archived on: Fri Jun 30 23:46:26 UTC 2023

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...