[Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Jun 28 14:40:17 UTC 2023


On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 02:36:45AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:22:22PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>Add raw_reg_* accessors and use them.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>>---
>>> .../drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c     | 15 ++----------
>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
>>>index 652654b5481d..a46dca558366 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
>>>@@ -140,4 +140,28 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_write_notrace(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>>> 	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, val);
>>> }
>>>
>>>+static inline void __iomem *intel_uncore_regs(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>>>+{
>>>+	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(uncore, struct xe_device, uncore);
>>>+
>>>+	return xe_device_get_root_tile(xe)->mmio.regs;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>+/*
>>>+ * The raw_reg_{read,write} macros are intended as a micro-optimization for
>>>+ * interrupt handlers so that the pointer indirection on uncore->regs can
>>>+ * be computed once (and presumably cached in a register) instead of generating
>>>+ * extra load instructions for each MMIO access.
>>>+ *
>>>+ * Given that these macros are only intended for non-GSI interrupt registers
>>>+ * (and the goal is to avoid extra instructions generated by the compiler),
>>>+ * these macros do not account for uncore->gsi_offset.  Any caller that needs
>>>+ * to use these macros on a GSI register is responsible for adding the
>>>+ * appropriate GSI offset to the 'base' parameter.
>>>+ */
>>>+#define raw_reg_read(base, reg) \
>>
>> it's more a "map" rather than a "base". Currently it bypasses any
>> forcewake, gsi and it's also hidden from tracing.
>>
>> As a micro-optimization I wonder if there are numbers anywhere to
>> justify them.  As for the *move* being done here from
>> xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c to xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h, I'm
>> ok with it. But why are we converting it to a macro rather than the
>> inline function?  That would mean it also silently ignores any steering
>> needed, adding to the list above of things ignored, since there is no
>> type check anymore.
>
>100% copy-paste from i915.

ok, series is then


Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi

>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>
>>
>> Lucas De Marchi
>>
>>>+	readl(base + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg))
>>>+#define raw_reg_write(base, reg, value) \
>>>+	writel(value, base + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg))
>>>+
>>> #endif /* __INTEL_UNCORE_H__ */
>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
>>>index 6235ff9dec36..157403d1d8fe 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
>>>@@ -35,8 +35,10 @@
>>> #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>>>
>>> #include "i915_drv.h"
>>>+#include "i915_irq.h"
>>> #include "i915_reg.h"
>>> #include "icl_dsi_regs.h"
>>>+#include "intel_clock_gating.h"
>>> #include "intel_display_trace.h"
>>> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>>> #include "intel_dp_aux.h"
>>>@@ -48,19 +50,6 @@
>>> #include "intel_psr_regs.h"
>>> #include "intel_uncore.h"
>>>
>>>-static u32 raw_reg_read(void __iomem *base, i915_reg_t reg)
>>>-{
>>>-	return readl(base + reg.reg);
>>>-}
>>>-
>>>-static void raw_reg_write(void __iomem *base, i915_reg_t reg, u32 value)
>>>-{
>>>-	writel(value, base + reg.reg);
>>>-}
>>>-
>>>-#include "i915_irq.h"
>>>-#include "intel_clock_gating.h"
>>>-
>>> static void gen3_irq_reset(struct xe_device *dev_priv, i915_reg_t imr,
>>> 		    i915_reg_t iir, i915_reg_t ier)
>>> {
>>>--
>>>2.39.2
>>>
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list