[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Replace DRM_ERROR() with drm_err()
Gustavo Sousa
gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Mon May 29 15:08:31 UTC 2023
DRM_ERROR() has been deprecated in favor of pr_err(). However, we should
prefer to use drm_err() whenever possible so we get device-specific
output with the error message.
Adding an "xe" member to struct xe_reg_sr does not seem very
justifiable, since the only as of now is to register a clean up function
and, with this change, print error messages. So let's just add a
parameter to xe_reg_sr_add().
v2:
- Prefer drm_err() over pr_err(). (Matt, Jani)
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Cc: Haridhar Kalvala <haridhar.kalvala at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c | 14 ++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
index 24d9c73ef279..02ba95223d7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ static void reg_sr_inc_error(struct xe_reg_sr *sr)
}
int xe_reg_sr_add(struct xe_reg_sr *sr,
- const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *e)
+ const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *e,
+ struct xe_device *xe)
{
unsigned long idx = e->reg.addr;
struct xe_reg_sr_entry *pentry = xa_load(&sr->xa, idx);
@@ -123,11 +124,12 @@ int xe_reg_sr_add(struct xe_reg_sr *sr,
return 0;
fail:
- DRM_ERROR("Discarding save-restore reg %04lx (clear: %08x, set: %08x, masked: %s, mcr: %s): ret=%d\n",
- idx, e->clr_bits, e->set_bits,
- str_yes_no(e->reg.masked),
- str_yes_no(e->reg.mcr),
- ret);
+ drm_err(&xe->drm,
+ "Discarding save-restore reg %04lx (clear: %08x, set: %08x, masked: %s, mcr: %s): ret=%d\n",
+ idx, e->clr_bits, e->set_bits,
+ str_yes_no(e->reg.masked),
+ str_yes_no(e->reg.mcr),
+ ret);
reg_sr_inc_error(sr);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h
index 0bfe66ea29bf..3e337f174ae3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.h
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ struct drm_printer;
int xe_reg_sr_init(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, const char *name, struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_reg_sr_dump(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, struct drm_printer *p);
-int xe_reg_sr_add(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *e);
+int xe_reg_sr_add(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *e,
+ struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_reg_sr_apply_mmio(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, struct xe_gt *gt);
void xe_reg_sr_apply_whitelist(struct xe_reg_sr *sr, u32 mmio_base,
struct xe_gt *gt);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
index 43a86358efb6..93067f4fd480 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void rtp_add_sr_entry(const struct xe_rtp_action *action,
};
sr_entry.reg.addr += mmio_base;
- xe_reg_sr_add(sr, &sr_entry);
+ xe_reg_sr_add(sr, &sr_entry, gt_to_xe(gt));
}
static bool rtp_process_one_sr(const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr *entry,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
index f73e08b60670..bf4a2732447b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/dma-fence-array.h>
+#include <drm/drm_print.h>
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.h>
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
#include <drm/xe_drm.h>
@@ -3035,7 +3036,7 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
}
if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, xe_vm_is_closed(vm))) {
- DRM_ERROR("VM closed while we began looking up?\n");
+ drm_err(&xe->drm, "VM closed while we began looking up?\n");
err = -ENOENT;
goto put_vm;
}
--
2.40.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list