[PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV policy settings over debugfs
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Apr 22 19:39:09 UTC 2024
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We already have functions to configure SR-IOV policies.
> Allow to tweak those policy settings over debugfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> index 8909bb950a8b..3a83af7aa039 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_control.h"
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.h"
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -76,6 +77,54 @@ static const struct drm_info_list pf_info[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
> + * ├── gt0
> + * │ ├── pf
> + * │ │ ├── reset_engine
> + * │ │ ├── sample_period
> + * │ │ ├── sched_if_idle
> + */
> +
> +#define DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY, TYPE, FORMAT) \
> + \
> +static int POLICY##_set(void *data, u64 val) \
> +{ \
> + struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data); \
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt); \
> + int err; \
> + \
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe); \
> + err = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_##POLICY(gt, val); \
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe); \
I like that this takes care of the runtime_pm in a 'global' way without duplication...
> + \
> + return err; \
> +} \
> + \
> +static int POLICY##_get(void *data, u64 *val) \
> +{ \
> + struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data); \
> + \
> + *val = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_get_##POLICY(gt); \
> + return 0; \
> +} \
> + \
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY##_fops, POLICY##_get, POLICY##_set, FORMAT)
> +
> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(reset_engine, bool, "%llu\n");
> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sched_if_idle, bool, "%llu\n");
> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sample_period, u32, "%llu\n");
... but, is there any other way we could accomplish this without this style
that hides function... I hate when I have to understand anything in i915-guc
code because you cannot navigate or grep for the functions that are declared
with magic macros like this.
but this is my only complain and no big suggestions. I would like to hear
from the xe maintainers here.
for the debugfs entries and rpm handling and everything I like that.
> +
> +static void pf_add_policy_attrs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *parent)
> +{
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, gt == extract_gt(parent));
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, PFID == extract_vfid(parent));
> +
> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("reset_engine", 0644, parent, parent, &reset_engine_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sched_if_idle", 0644, parent, parent, &sched_if_idle_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sample_period_ms", 0644, parent, parent, &sample_period_fops);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
> * ├── gt0
> @@ -261,6 +310,7 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
> pfdentry->d_inode->i_private = gt;
>
> drm_debugfs_create_files(pf_info, ARRAY_SIZE(pf_info), pfdentry, minor);
> + pf_add_policy_attrs(gt, pfdentry);
> pf_add_config_attrs(gt, pfdentry, PFID);
>
> for (n = 1; n <= totalvfs; n++) {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list