[PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pf: Expose SR-IOV policy settings over debugfs
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Mon Apr 22 20:05:45 UTC 2024
On 22.04.2024 21:39, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> We already have functions to configure SR-IOV policies.
>> Allow to tweak those policy settings over debugfs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> index 8909bb950a8b..3a83af7aa039 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_control.h"
>> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.h"
>> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
>> +#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h"
>> #include "xe_pm.h"
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -76,6 +77,54 @@ static const struct drm_info_list pf_info[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
>> + * ├── gt0
>> + * │ ├── pf
>> + * │ │ ├── reset_engine
>> + * │ │ ├── sample_period
>> + * │ │ ├── sched_if_idle
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY, TYPE, FORMAT) \
>> + \
>> +static int POLICY##_set(void *data, u64 val) \
>> +{ \
>> + struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data); \
>> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt); \
>> + int err; \
>> + \
>> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe); \
>> + err = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_set_##POLICY(gt, val); \
>> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe); \
>
> I like that this takes care of the runtime_pm in a 'global' way without duplication...
>
>> + \
>> + return err; \
>> +} \
>> + \
>> +static int POLICY##_get(void *data, u64 *val) \
>> +{ \
>> + struct xe_gt *gt = extract_gt(data); \
>> + \
>> + *val = xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy_get_##POLICY(gt); \
>> + return 0; \
>> +} \
>> + \
>> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(POLICY##_fops, POLICY##_get, POLICY##_set, FORMAT)
>> +
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(reset_engine, bool, "%llu\n");
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sched_if_idle, bool, "%llu\n");
>> +DEFINE_SRIOV_GT_POLICY_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(sample_period, u32, "%llu\n");
>
> ... but, is there any other way we could accomplish this without this style
> that hides function... I hate when I have to understand anything in i915-guc
> code because you cannot navigate or grep for the functions that are declared
> with magic macros like this.
but such template macros are quite widely used (at least for sysfs)
$ cgrep ssize_t.*\\#.*show.*\\\\ | wc -l
189
and IMO it's better to have one template than replicate very similar
code N times with just one line difference
besides this are static functions, no need to grep anywhere else
>
> but this is my only complain and no big suggestions. I would like to hear
> from the xe maintainers here.
>
> for the debugfs entries and rpm handling and everything I like that.
>
>> +
>> +static void pf_add_policy_attrs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *parent)
>> +{
>> + xe_gt_assert(gt, gt == extract_gt(parent));
>> + xe_gt_assert(gt, PFID == extract_vfid(parent));
>> +
>> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("reset_engine", 0644, parent, parent, &reset_engine_fops);
>> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sched_if_idle", 0644, parent, parent, &sched_if_idle_fops);
>> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("sample_period_ms", 0644, parent, parent, &sample_period_fops);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/
>> * ├── gt0
>> @@ -261,6 +310,7 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
>> pfdentry->d_inode->i_private = gt;
>>
>> drm_debugfs_create_files(pf_info, ARRAY_SIZE(pf_info), pfdentry, minor);
>> + pf_add_policy_attrs(gt, pfdentry);
>> pf_add_config_attrs(gt, pfdentry, PFID);
>>
>> for (n = 1; n <= totalvfs; n++) {
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list