[PATCH] drm/xe: Use pointers in trace events
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 22 16:12:11 UTC 2024
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 06:41 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Commit a0df2cc858c3 ("drm/xe/xe_bo_move: Enhance xe_bo_move trace")
> inadvertently reverted commit 8d038f49c1f3 ("drm/xe: Fix cast on
> trace
> variable"), breaking the build on 32bits.
>
> As noted by Ville, there's no point in converting the pointers to u64
> and add casts everywhere. In fact, it's better to just use %p and let
> the address be hashed. Convert all the cases in xe_trace.h to use
> pointers.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Cc: Priyanka Dandamudi <priyanka.dandamudi at intel.com>
> Cc: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> index 0cce98a6b14b7..3b97633d81d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h
> @@ -27,16 +27,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence,
> TP_ARGS(fence),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> - __field(u64, fence)
> + __field(struct
> xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *, fence)
> __field(int, seqno)
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> - __entry->fence = (u64)fence;
> + __entry->fence = fence;
> __entry->seqno = fence->seqno;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("fence=0x%016llx, seqno=%d",
> + TP_printk("fence=%p, seqno=%d",
> __entry->fence, __entry->seqno)
> );
>
> @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_bo,
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(size_t, size)
> __field(u32, flags)
> - __field(u64, vm)
> + __field(struct xe_vm *, vm)
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->size = bo->size;
> __entry->flags = bo->flags;
> - __entry->vm = (unsigned long)bo->vm;
> + __entry->vm = bo->vm;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("size=%zu, flags=0x%02x,
> vm=0x%016llx",
> + TP_printk("size=%zu, flags=0x%02x, vm=%p",
> __entry->size, __entry->flags,
> __entry->vm)
> );
>
> @@ -346,16 +346,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_hw_fence,
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(u64, ctx)
> __field(u32, seqno)
> - __field(u64, fence)
> + __field(struct xe_hw_fence *, fence)
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->ctx = fence->dma.context;
> __entry->seqno = fence->dma.seqno;
> - __entry->fence = (unsigned long)fence;
> + __entry->fence = fence;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("ctx=0x%016llx, fence=0x%016llx,
> seqno=%u",
> + TP_printk("ctx=0x%016llx, fence=%p, seqno=%u",
> __entry->ctx, __entry->fence, __entry-
> >seqno)
> );
>
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_vma,
> TP_ARGS(vma),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> - __field(u64, vma)
> + __field(struct xe_vma *, vma)
> __field(u32, asid)
> __field(u64, start)
> __field(u64, end)
> @@ -392,14 +392,14 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_vma,
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> - __entry->vma = (unsigned long)vma;
> + __entry->vma = vma;
> __entry->asid = xe_vma_vm(vma)->usm.asid;
> __entry->start = xe_vma_start(vma);
> __entry->end = xe_vma_end(vma) - 1;
> __entry->ptr = xe_vma_userptr(vma);
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("vma=0x%016llx, asid=0x%05x,
> start=0x%012llx, end=0x%012llx, ptr=0x%012llx,",
> + TP_printk("vma=%p, asid=0x%05x, start=0x%012llx,
> end=0x%012llx, userptr=0x%012llx,",
> __entry->vma, __entry->asid, __entry-
> >start,
> __entry->end, __entry->ptr)
> )
> @@ -484,16 +484,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xe_vm,
> TP_ARGS(vm),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> - __field(u64, vm)
> + __field(struct xe_vm *, vm)
> __field(u32, asid)
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> - __entry->vm = (unsigned long)vm;
> + __entry->vm = vm;
> __entry->asid = vm->usm.asid;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("vm=0x%016llx, asid=0x%05x", __entry-
> >vm,
> + TP_printk("vm=%p, asid=0x%05x", __entry->vm,
> __entry->asid)
> );
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list