[GIT PULL] Enable -Wstringop-overflow globally
Gustavo A. R. Silva
gustavo at embeddedor.com
Sat Jan 27 19:53:00 UTC 2024
On 1/27/24 09:11, David Laight wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds
>> Sent: 26 January 2024 22:36
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:24, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think xe has some other weird problems too. This may be related (under
>>> allocating):
>>>
>>> ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c: In function 'xe_vma_create':
>>> ../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:806:21: warning: allocation of insufficient size '224' for type
>> 'struct xe_vma' with size '368' [-Walloc-size]
>>> 806 | vma = kzalloc(sizeof(*vma) - sizeof(struct xe_userptr),
>>> | ^
>>
>> That code is indeed odd, but there's a comment in the xe_vma definition
>>
>> /**
>> * @userptr: user pointer state, only allocated for VMAs that are
>> * user pointers
>> */
>> struct xe_userptr userptr;
>>
>> although I agree that it should probably simply be made a final
>> variably-sized array instead (and then you make that array size be
>> 0/1).
>
> That entire code is odd.
> It isn't obvious that the flag values that cause the short allocate
> are the same ones that control whether the extra data is accessed.
>
> Never mind the oddities with the 'flags |= ' assignments int the
> 'remap next' path.
>
> Anyone know how many of these actually get allocated (and their
> lifetimes)?
> How much difference would it make to allocate 368 (maybe 384?)
> bytes instead of 224 (likely 256).
[CC+ xen list and maintainers]
Probably the xen maintainer can help us out here.
--
Gustavo
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list