✓ CI.BAT: success for Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue Jul 2 14:29:42 UTC 2024


On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:01:28AM GMT, Patchwork wrote:
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"
>URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135623/
>State : success
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from xe-1542-886eeb6d89b58f914ee5045fcac54b59a73d8299_BAT -> xe-pw-135623v1_BAT
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
>  **SUCCESS**
>
>  No regressions found.
>
>
>
>Participating hosts (5 -> 4)
>------------------------------
>
>  Missing    (1): bat-lnl-1

I guess it didn't really work. +Ryszard +Ewelina: Can we promote LNL to
be considered "a reliable machine from the CI POV" so we don't have
"CI.BAT: success" when LNL execution is missing?  Or is there any other
reason why we report success in this case?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list