✓ CI.BAT: success for Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue Jul 2 14:29:42 UTC 2024
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:01:28AM GMT, Patchwork wrote:
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"
>URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135623/
>State : success
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from xe-1542-886eeb6d89b58f914ee5045fcac54b59a73d8299_BAT -> xe-pw-135623v1_BAT
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
> **SUCCESS**
>
> No regressions found.
>
>
>
>Participating hosts (5 -> 4)
>------------------------------
>
> Missing (1): bat-lnl-1
I guess it didn't really work. +Ryszard +Ewelina: Can we promote LNL to
be considered "a reliable machine from the CI POV" so we don't have
"CI.BAT: success" when LNL execution is missing? Or is there any other
reason why we report success in this case?
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list