Re: ✓ CI.BAT: success for Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"

[Daniele Ceraolo Spurio]

On 7/2/2024 7:29 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:01:28AM GMT, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: Reapply "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"
>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135623/
>> State : success
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from 
>> xe-1542-886eeb6d89b58f914ee5045fcac54b59a73d8299_BAT -> 
>> xe-pw-135623v1_BAT
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>>  **SUCCESS**
>>
>>  No regressions found.
>>
>>
>>
>> Participating hosts (5 -> 4)
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>  Missing    (1): bat-lnl-1
>
> I guess it didn't really work. +Ryszard +Ewelina: Can we promote LNL to
> be considered "a reliable machine from the CI POV" so we don't have
> "CI.BAT: success" when LNL execution is missing?  Or is there any other
> reason why we report success in this case?

Damn. I can't repro the issue anymore with this WA applied and even in 
CI we weren't seeing it when I sent it for testing before: 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/134099/ . I did 3 runs in that 
case and none of them hit the problem.

I've triggered another run to see if we get any better logs.

Daniele

>
> thanks
> Lucas De Marchi