[CI] drm/xe/guc: Remove spurious line feed in debug print

Souza, Jose jose.souza at intel.com
Thu Jun 27 13:53:07 UTC 2024


On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 23:18 +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> On 26.06.2024 22:35, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 22:12 +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Including line feeds at the start of a debug print messes up the
> > > output when sent to dmesg. The break actually appears between all the
> > > usefu prefix information and the actual string being printed. In this
> > > case, each block of data has a very clear start line and an extra
> > > delimeter is really not necessary. So don't do it.
> > 
> > I guess the indention was to have one blank like between guc_ctb_snapshot_print() 'cmd[X]' lines and 'G2H CTB (all sizes in DW):'.
> > I agree with the change if you add one line breaker in the end of guc_ctb_snapshot_print().
> 
> but 'cmd[XXX]' lines already have additional indent compared to 'H2G|G2H
> CTB' headers so IMO this extra separation line seems unnecessary:
> 
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: TLB invalidation time'd out,
> seqno=27, recv=26
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: H2G CTB (all sizes in DW):
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      size: 1024
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      resv_space: 0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      head: 0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      tail: 572
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      space: 451
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      broken: 0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      head (memory): 568
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      tail (memory): 572
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      status (memory): 0x0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      cmd[568]: 0x80670003
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      cmd[569]: 0x20007000
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      cmd[570]: 0x0000001b
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      cmd[571]: 0x80000003
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: G2H CTB (all sizes in DW):
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      size: 4096
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      resv_space: 1024
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      head: 210
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      tail: 0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      space: 3068
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      broken: 0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      head (memory): 210
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      tail (memory): 210
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      status (memory): 0x0
> [ ] xe 0000:4d:00.1: [drm] *ERROR* GT0:      g2h outstanding: 1
> 
> and IMO printing empty lines is just a waste of paper ;)

This same function is called during gpu hang capture(devcoredump) and the output of that file has new lines between sections for better reading.
This a old sample that I had around:



**** Xe Device Coredump ****
kernel: 6.9.0-rc6-zeh-xe+
module: xe
Snapshot time: 1715877420.647211377
Uptime: 70684.605982665
PCI ID: 0x9a49
PCI revision: 0x01
GT id: 0
	Type: main
	IP ver: 0.0.0
	CS reference clock: 19200000

**** GuC CT ****
H2G CTB (all sizes in DW):
	size: 1024
	resv_space: 0
	head: 978
	tail: 599
	space: 378
	broken: 0
	head (memory): 599
	tail (memory): 599
	status (memory): 0x0

G2H CTB (all sizes in DW):
	size: 4096
	resv_space: 1024
	head: 626
	tail: 0
	space: 3071
	broken: 0
	head (memory): 626
	tail (memory): 626
	status (memory): 0x0
	g2h outstanding: 0

GuC ID: 9
	Name: rcs9
	Class: 0
	Logical mask: 0x1
	Width: 1
	Ref: 4
	Timeout: 0 (ms)
	Timeslice: 1000 (us)
	Preempt timeout: 640000 (us)
	HW Context Desc: 0x01480000
	LRC Head: (memory) 280
	LRC Tail: (internal) 552, (memory) 552
	Start seqno: (memory) -125
	Seqno: (memory) -126
	[HWSP].length: 0x1000

....


> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > cherry-picked from [1]
> > > 
> > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/598024/?series=134695&rev=2
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > index 873d1bcbedd7..113e6348c6ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> > > @@ -1489,7 +1489,7 @@ void xe_guc_ct_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc_ct_snapshot *snapshot,
> > >  		drm_puts(p, "H2G CTB (all sizes in DW):\n");
> > >  		guc_ctb_snapshot_print(&snapshot->h2g, p);
> > >  
> > > -		drm_puts(p, "\nG2H CTB (all sizes in DW):\n");
> > > +		drm_puts(p, "G2H CTB (all sizes in DW):\n");
> > >  		guc_ctb_snapshot_print(&snapshot->g2h, p);
> > >  
> > >  		drm_printf(p, "\tg2h outstanding: %d\n",
> > 



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list