[PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/pciids: separate ARL and MTL PCI IDs

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Sep 5 07:46:35 UTC 2024


On Thu, 05 Sep 2024, "Chauhan, Shekhar" <shekhar.chauhan at intel.com> wrote:
> On 9/4/2024 3:16 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Avoid including PCI IDs for one platform to the PCI IDs of another. It's
>> more clear to deal with them completely separately at the PCI ID macro
>> level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c   |  1 +
>>   include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h | 13 ++++++++-----
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> index b1cf21d77def..5c5eef2ae725 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
>>   	XE_ATS_M_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &ats_m_desc),
>>   	XE_DG2_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &dg2_desc),
>>   	XE_PVC_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &pvc_desc),
>> +	XE_ARL_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &mtl_desc),
> With this approach of segregating PCI IDs of two platforms, wouldn't it 
> make more sense to have two separate platform descriptors as well, say, 
> mtl_desc and a new one "arl_desc"?

Not if they are exactly the same.

>>   	XE_MTL_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &mtl_desc),
>>   	XE_LNL_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &lnl_desc),
>>   	XE_BMG_IDS(INTEL_VGA_DEVICE, &bmg_desc),
>> diff --git a/include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h b/include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h
>> index 334ab02ed6ca..67baa7c2246a 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/intel/xe_pciids.h
>> @@ -176,16 +176,19 @@
>>   	XE_ATS_M150_IDS(MACRO__, ## __VA_ARGS__),\
>>   	XE_ATS_M75_IDS(MACRO__, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>>   
>> -/* MTL / ARL */
>> +/* ARL */
>> +#define XE_ARL_IDS(MACRO__, ...)		\
>> +	MACRO__(0x7D41, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> +	MACRO__(0x7D51, ## __VA_ARGS__),        \
>> +	MACRO__(0x7D67, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> +	MACRO__(0x7DD1, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>> +
> Also, if we're following platform public release timelines, can we have 
> MTL block of PCI IDs above the ARL block?

Can do if it matters.

BR,
Jani.

>> +/* MTL */
>>   #define XE_MTL_IDS(MACRO__, ...)		\
>>   	MACRO__(0x7D40, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> -	MACRO__(0x7D41, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>>   	MACRO__(0x7D45, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> -	MACRO__(0x7D51, ## __VA_ARGS__),        \
>>   	MACRO__(0x7D55, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>>   	MACRO__(0x7D60, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> -	MACRO__(0x7D67, ## __VA_ARGS__),	\
>> -	MACRO__(0x7DD1, ## __VA_ARGS__),        \
>>   	MACRO__(0x7DD5, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>>   
>>   /* PVC */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list