[PATCH] drm/i915/xe2hpd: Identify the memory type for SKUs with GDDR + ECC

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Fri Mar 21 06:35:16 UTC 2025


On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 01:59:44PM -0800, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
>Some SKUs of Xe2_HPD platforms (such as BMG) have GDDR memory type
>with ECC enabled. We need to identify this scenario and add a new
>case in xelpdp_get_dram_info() to handle it. In addition, the
>derating value needs to be adjusted accordingly to compensate for
>the limited bandwidth.
>
>Bspec: 64602
>Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c   | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h    | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>index 23edc81741de..b8a9651b74d3 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
>@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> 			qi->deinterleave = 4;
> 			break;
> 		case INTEL_DRAM_GDDR:
>+		case INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC:
> 			qi->channel_width = 32;
> 			break;
> 		default:
>@@ -630,9 +631,11 @@ static int xe2_hpd_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> 	for (i = 0; i < qi.num_points; i++) {
> 		const struct intel_qgv_point *point = &qi.points[i];
> 		int bw = num_channels * (qi.channel_width / 8) * point->dclk;
>+		u8 derating = i915->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC ?
>+				45 : sa->derating;

looks wrong to leave the sa->derating with the wrong value and just
patch it here.

By the time intel_bw_init_hw() is called, we already have i915->dram_info->type.
So maybe it'd be better to fork a struct intel_sa_info for this case and
have the correct derating consistently? Otherwise, at least moving this
out of the loop would be appropriate IMO.

Matt, thoughts?

There was a small conflict due to the move to intel_display, but
otherwise this commit still applies.

Lucas De Marchi

>
> 		i915->display.bw.max[0].deratedbw[i] =
>-			min(maxdebw, (100 - sa->derating) * bw / 100);
>+			min(maxdebw, (100 - derating) * bw / 100);
> 		i915->display.bw.max[0].peakbw[i] = bw;
>
> 		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "QGV %d: deratedbw=%u peakbw: %u\n",
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>index ffc346379cc2..54538b6f85df 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> 			INTEL_DRAM_DDR5,
> 			INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR5,
> 			INTEL_DRAM_GDDR,
>+			INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC,
> 		} type;
> 		u8 num_qgv_points;
> 		u8 num_psf_gv_points;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>index 9e310f4099f4..f60eedb0e92c 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>@@ -687,6 +687,10 @@ static int xelpdp_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> 		drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !IS_DGFX(i915));
> 		dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_GDDR;
> 		break;
>+	case 9:
>+		drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !IS_DGFX(i915));
>+		dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC;
>+		break;
> 	default:
> 		MISSING_CASE(val);
> 		return -EINVAL;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>index 4656305dd45a..0921e957d784 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ struct xe_device {
> 			INTEL_DRAM_DDR5,
> 			INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR5,
> 			INTEL_DRAM_GDDR,
>+			INTEL_DRAM_GDDR_ECC,
> 		} type;
> 		u8 num_qgv_points;
> 		u8 num_psf_gv_points;
>-- 
>2.47.1
>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list