[Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] v6.15-rc3: 1a931c4f5e68 ("igc: add lock preventing multiple simultaneous PTM transactions")
Tony Nguyen
anthony.l.nguyen at intel.com
Tue May 6 16:24:30 UTC 2025
On 5/5/2025 3:53 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025, "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah at intel.com> wrote:
>> Hello Christopher,
>>
>> This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on drm-tip[2] repository.
>
> The regressing commit is in v6.15-rc3. Updated subject and Cc'd
> regression tracking.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
Hi Jani,
This should be resolved with commit c7d6cb96d5c3 ("igc: fix lock order
in igc_ptp_reset") in v6.15-rc5.
Thanks,
Tony
>>
>> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>> <4>[ 7.891028] =============================
>> <4>[ 7.891293] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
>> <4>[ 7.891526] 6.15.0-rc3-CI_DRM_16443-gdc80d6a10c1c+ #1 Tainted: G W
>> <4>[ 7.891792] -----------------------------
>> <4>[ 7.892070] (udev-worker)/286 is trying to lock:
>> <4>[ 7.892349] ffff88811671bcc8 (&adapter->ptm_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: igc_ptp_reset+0x155/0x320 [igc]
>> <4>[ 7.892660] other info that might help us debug this:
>> <4>[ 7.892943] context-{4:4}
>> <4>[ 7.893226] 2 locks held by (udev-worker)/286:
>> <4>[ 7.893515] #0: ffff888103bd41b0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x104/0x220
>> <4>[ 7.893823] #1: ffff88811671bb70 (&adapter->tmreg_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: igc_ptp_reset+0x53/0x320 [igc]
>> <4>[ 7.894134] stack backtrace:
>> <4>[ 7.894439] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 286 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G W 6.15.0-rc3-CI_DRM_16443-gdc80d6a10c1c+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
>> <4>[ 7.894442] Tainted: [W]=WARN
>> <4>[ 7.894443] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC11TNHi3/NUC11TNBi3, BIOS TNTGL357.0067.2022.0718.1742 07/18/2022
>> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>> Detailed log can be found in [3].
>>
>> After bisecting the tree, the following patch [4] seems to be the first "bad"
>> commit
>>
>> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>> commit 1a931c4f5e6862e61a4b130cb76b422e1415f644
>> Author: Christopher S M Hall mailto:christopher.s.hall at intel.com
>> Date: Tue Apr 1 16:35:34 2025 -0700
>>
>> igc: add lock preventing multiple simultaneous PTM transactions
>> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>>
>> We also verified that if we revert the patch the issue is not seen.
>>
>> Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a fix if necessary?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Chaitanya
>>
>> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shard-tglu.html
>> [2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/tree/
>> [3] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16443/fi-tgl-1115g4/boot0.txt
>> [4] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=1a931c4f5e6862e61a4b130cb76b422e1415f644
>>
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list