[PATCH] drm/xe: Add POST_SYNC prefix to post sync instructions
Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
dnyaneshwar.bhadane at intel.com
Mon May 12 06:42:03 UTC 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vodapalli, Ravi Kumar <ravi.kumar.vodapalli at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 3:00 PM
> To: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Vivekanandan, Balasubramani <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>;
> Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas
> <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>; Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>;
> Taylor, Clinton A <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>; Atwood, Matthew S
> <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>; Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
> <dnyaneshwar.bhadane at intel.com>; Kalvala, Haridhar
> <haridhar.kalvala at intel.com>; Chauhan, Shekhar
> <shekhar.chauhan at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe: Add POST_SYNC prefix to post sync instructions
>
> In existing code for PIPE CONTROL post sync operation instructions
> POST_SYNC prefix is not present in the name, add it so that it will represent it
> is a post sync operation type.
Is there a specific reason for this renaming? Is it truly necessary?
Regardless, the terms PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_TYPE_QW_WRITE and PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_OP_TYPE_QW_WRITE would be more descriptive.
If renaming is indeed required, it should be applied to PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_TIMESTAMP.
This refers to all the post-sync operation types defined and used in the code within the Xe/i915 context.
Renaming can clutter the Git history with unnecessary changes, making it harder to track the evolution of the code and understand the reasons behind certain modification.
Regards,
Dnyaneshwar
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_gpu_commands.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_gpu_commands.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_gpu_commands.h
> index 8cfcd3360896..75efdacc4979 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_gpu_commands.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_gpu_commands.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_SNAPSHOT_RESET (1<<19)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE
> BIT(18)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_PSD_SYNC (1<<17)
> -#define PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE (1<<14)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_QW_WRITE (1<<14)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_STALL (1<<13)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH (1<<12)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<11)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> index a7582b097ae6..da50213b78c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int emit_pipe_invalidate(u32 mask_flags, bool
> invalidate_tlb, u32 *dw,
> PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
> PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
> PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
> - PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
> + PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_QW_WRITE |
> PIPE_CONTROL_STORE_DATA_INDEX;
>
> if (invalidate_tlb)
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int emit_pipe_imm_ggtt(u32 addr, u32 value,
> bool stall_only, u32 *dw,
> int i)
> {
> u32 flags = PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
> PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB |
> - PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE;
> + PIPE_CONTROL_POST_SYNC_QW_WRITE;
>
> if (!stall_only)
> flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE;
> --
> 2.25.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list