[PATCH v2 20/32] drm/xe/vma: Modify new_vma to accept struct xe_vma_mem_attr as parameter

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Wed May 14 18:40:32 UTC 2025


On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 07:36:56PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 03:47:07PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> > This change simplifies the logic by ensuring that remapped previous or
> > next VMAs are created with the same memory attributes as the original VMA.
> > By passing struct xe_vma_mem_attr as a parameter, we maintain consistency
> > in memory attributes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > index 59e2a951db25..6e5ba58d475e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > @@ -2421,8 +2421,16 @@ vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> >  
> >  ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(vm_bind_ioctl_ops_create, ERRNO);
> >  
> > +static void cp_mem_attr(struct xe_vma_mem_attr *dst, struct xe_vma_mem_attr *src)
> 
> Drive by commment - not need.
> 
> memcopy(dst, src, sizeof(*src));
> 

Actually you can just do:

*dst = *src;

> Matt
> 
> > +{
> > +	dst->preferred_loc.migration_policy = src->preferred_loc.migration_policy;
> > +	dst->preferred_loc.devmem_fd =  src->preferred_loc.devmem_fd;
> > +	dst->atomic_access = src->atomic_access;
> > +	dst->pat_index = src->pat_index;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct xe_vma *new_vma(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_op_map *op,
> > -			      u16 pat_index, unsigned int flags)
> > +			      struct xe_vma_mem_attr attr, unsigned int flags)
> >  {
> >  	struct xe_bo *bo = op->gem.obj ? gem_to_xe_bo(op->gem.obj) : NULL;
> >  	struct drm_exec exec;
> > @@ -2451,7 +2459,7 @@ static struct xe_vma *new_vma(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_op_map *op,
> >  	}
> >  	vma = xe_vma_create(vm, bo, op->gem.offset,
> >  			    op->va.addr, op->va.addr +
> > -			    op->va.range - 1, pat_index, flags);
> > +			    op->va.range - 1, attr.pat_index, flags);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(vma))
> >  		goto err_unlock;
> >  
> > @@ -2468,14 +2476,10 @@ static struct xe_vma *new_vma(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_op_map *op,
> >  		prep_vma_destroy(vm, vma, false);
> >  		xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(vma);
> >  		vma = ERR_PTR(err);
> > +	} else {
> > +		cp_mem_attr(&vma->attr, &attr);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/*TODO: assign devmem_fd of local vram once multi device
> > -	 * support is added.
> > -	 */
> > -	vma->attr.preferred_loc.devmem_fd = 1;
> > -	vma->attr.atomic_access = DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_UNDEFINED;
> > -
> >  	return vma;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2600,6 +2604,17 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> >  		switch (op->base.op) {
> >  		case DRM_GPUVA_OP_MAP:
> >  		{
> > +			struct xe_vma_mem_attr default_attr = {
> > +				.preferred_loc = {
> > +						  /*TODO: assign devmem_fd of local vram
> > +						   * once multi device support is added.
> > +						   */
> > +						   .devmem_fd = IS_DGFX(vm->xe) ? 1 : 0,
> > +						   .migration_policy = 1,	},

Where are a couple of magic '1' which I suggested to avoid patch 18.
Same question as patch 18 on the usage of these.

In general I think this patch makes sense if the to previous patches
land.

Matt

> > +				.atomic_access = DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_UNDEFINED,
> > +				.pat_index = op->map.pat_index
> > +			};
> > +
> >  			flags |= op->map.read_only ?
> >  				VMA_CREATE_FLAG_READ_ONLY : 0;
> >  			flags |= op->map.is_null ?
> > @@ -2609,7 +2624,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> >  			flags |= op->map.is_cpu_addr_mirror ?
> >  				VMA_CREATE_FLAG_IS_SYSTEM_ALLOCATOR : 0;
> >  
> > -			vma = new_vma(vm, &op->base.map, op->map.pat_index,
> > +			vma = new_vma(vm, &op->base.map, default_attr,
> >  				      flags);
> >  			if (IS_ERR(vma))
> >  				return PTR_ERR(vma);
> > @@ -2657,7 +2672,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> >  
> >  			if (op->base.remap.prev) {
> >  				vma = new_vma(vm, op->base.remap.prev,
> > -					      old->attr.pat_index, flags);
> > +					      old->attr, flags);
> >  				if (IS_ERR(vma))
> >  					return PTR_ERR(vma);
> >  
> > @@ -2687,7 +2702,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> >  
> >  			if (op->base.remap.next) {
> >  				vma = new_vma(vm, op->base.remap.next,
> > -					      old->attr.pat_index, flags);
> > +					      old->attr, flags);
> >  				if (IS_ERR(vma))
> >  					return PTR_ERR(vma);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list