[LDTP-Dev] ldtprunner not so robust?

[Nagappan A]

Hi Tac,

tac wrote:
> Hi lists,
>         Recently using the ldtprunner to startup some test suites.
> Find it is much powerful a tool : )
>        Still I find some seemingly like problems with it:
>         1. the test suite path providing for ldtprunner to find the 
> test_suite_xml file
>  shouldn't have any "../" kind of thing in it, in which case ldtprunner 
> just omits  it. This
> prevents me from executing the gnome-desktop-testing cases directly in 
> case you may
> know that project in Gnome : )
>   
I tried this scenario. If the .py file doesn't exist in the current 
directory, the testcase will fail, as it can't find the .py file. 
Anyways attached a fix, could you please try this ?
>        2.  Even  if  "ldtp-daemon" wasn't started  in  background,  
> ldtprunner  wouldn't
> give any complaints and just  quit quietly.  Though  it  may  be  able 
> to check through
> log file, but I just suggested ldtprunner could give more warnings that 
> may sound
> friendly to user ?
>   
In Linux, we no need to start the daemon, unlesss if it doesn't exist in 
the path. How does this work in Solaris environment ?

Thanks
Nagappan
>       Correct me if I may wrong, thanks!
>
> B.R.
>
> tac
> _______________________________________________
> LDTP-dev mailing list
> LDTP-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ldtp-dev
>   

-- 
Linux Desktop Testing Project - http://ldtp.freedesktop.org
http://nagappanal.blogspot.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ldtprunner.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5648 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/ldtp-dev/attachments/20090217/08f98eb1/attachment.bin