test failed using Huawei E3276
Bjørn Mork
bjorn at mork.no
Wed Aug 29 00:19:55 PDT 2012
Tommy Cheng <tommy7765 at yahoo.com> writes:
> Hi
>
> I was trying to test Huawei E3276 with the latest libqmi. But unfortunately, it is not
> working.
>
>
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
> P: Vendor=12d1 ProdID=1506 Rev= 1.02
> S: Manufacturer=HUAWEI Technology
> S: Product=HUAWEI Mobile
> C:* #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=500mA
> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=12 Driver=usbserial_generic
> E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=4ms
This interface should be supported by the option driver by default after
a very recent update from Huawei, adding among other things:
+ { USB_VENDOR_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(HUAWEI_VENDOR_ID, 0xff, 0x02, 0x12) },
> I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=16 Driver=qmi_wwan
> E: Ad=82(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 64 Ivl=2ms
> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=16 Driver=qmi_wwan
> E: Ad=82(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 64 Ivl=2ms
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=4ms
Are you sure this is a QMI interface? Do you have a Windows driver .inf
file indicating that it is? I've not yet deciphered what Huawei use the
subclass for, but we should assume that there is an important difference
between subclass 1 and 2.
It may very well be some sort of NDIS interface, but we have no
indications that it supports QMI.
> I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usbserial_generic
> E: Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=84(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> I:* If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usbserial_generic
> E: Ad=04(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=85(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
And these are usb-storage. I assume they are bound to usbserial_generic
because you used the vendor and product options for usbserial?
So 4 interfaces, where only 2 of them are non-storage. That does not
really look like any other QMI device I've seen. I believe they all have
at least 2 serial ports (AT + QCDM) in addition to QMI.
But anything is possible, of course. The vendors are free to hide
whatever they want.
Bjørn
More information about the libqmi-devel
mailing list