RX-fixup question.
Markus Gothe
nietzsche at lysator.liu.se
Wed Nov 5 01:43:48 PST 2014
For briding you want two differently adresses.
Especially if you want to do extra magic with tools like ebtables.
A private source adress is to prefer. A shared adress would cause me headache when not briding. ;-)
I will look at the WiMaX driver. Thx for the feedback.
//M
Skickat ifrån min mobil.
Den 5 nov 2014 10:36 skrev =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn_Mork?= <bjorn at mork.no>:
>
> Markus Gothe <markus at dovado.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for the information...
> > Then I should start working on a decent mac source address fix for it. Ive applied an u8-string to usbnet.h if using QMI or MBIM.
> >
> > Any opnions on this approach?
>
> I am not sure there is much gain in making this a usbnet feature. Is it
> relevant to any other usbnet drivers than those two?
>
> I did some tests using the local device address as both source and dest,
> but I guess that doesn't work for bridging? It will probably want
> different valid addresses?
>
> Hmm, qmi_wwan already has the "default_modem_addr", which actually is
> used as source address by some devices. Reusing for our source address
> seems like an obvious simplification. Any reason not to do this?
>
> Grepping a bit around the kernel I found this driver which does similar
> header tricks: drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/. But that driver stores a per
> device random src_mac_addr in the device private data. I believe this is
> overkill for our purpose. A shared static address will do just
> fine. Won't it?
>
>
>
> Bjørn
More information about the libqmi-devel
mailing list