Backport qmi wwan driver to linux 2.6.32 on ARM

[Markus Gothe]

Bøjrn,
you actually don’t pay them for “Linux support”. You pay them for a certain hardware and a SDK,
5-6 years ago it used to be some VxWork version or QNX-like system for embedded routers.

What "you pay is what you get” is more or the less what fits in best into this.

//M

On 11 Aug 2015, at 20:06 , Bjørn Mork <bjorn at mork.no> wrote:

> Markus Gothe <nietzsche at lysator.liu.se> writes:
> 
>> Bjørn, you do realise that the vendor support an SDK without QMI and
>> is not going to do the work for an old platform / SDK? :-)
> 
> Sure.  You paid them for "Linux support" and all you got was a stinking
> out-dated kernel.  It sucks.  Just like losing money to any other scam.
> 
> Next time you'll select a vendor pushing drivers and board support into
> mainline.
> 
> 
> Bjørn

//Markus - The panama-hat hacker

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libqmi-devel/attachments/20150812/e85420af/attachment.sig>