EM7565 / carrier aggregation info

Aleksander Morgado aleksander at aleksander.es
Mon Dec 4 12:45:20 UTC 2017

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn at mork.no> wrote:
> So how about something like this patch?  If someone has access to docs,
> then please fix the names of TLVs and struct members.  If not, then I
> guess we can fix that up later if/when docs become available.
> Since all the info related to the first secondary cell is redundant, I
> thought it was better to hide it in the cli output.  Don't know if that
> makes sense or not?  Maybe we want the duplicate info just to make sure
> it is consistent?
> This hiding is also the reason I reordered the output.  I find it less
> confusing to list the primary cell first in any case.
> Don't know the exact meaning of the 'DL Bandwidth' TLV.  Is this also a
> redundant value related to the first secondary?  Or is it related to the
> primary? I typically get '20' for both, so it is hard to say ;-) If it
> is related to the secondary, then I guess it should be hidden along with
> the rest of the redundant TLVs if TLV 0x15 is present.  If you decide to
> go for my proposed hiding...

I believe the hiding part is ok; the info would be redundant otherwise.


More information about the libqmi-devel mailing list