[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102256] ODF filter: <table:table> as child of <draw:custom-shape> is written in case of strict ODF1.2, but invalid

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102256

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel <rb.henschel at t-online.de> ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #4)
> Reading this one, I wonder if we shouldn't add a dialog indicating that
> since we use ODF 1.2 strict, some parts of the documents won't be exported
> so a backup should be made.

The export to ODF 1.2 strict is only available via Tools > Options. So I
assume, that users who switch to strict are advanced users. I think, that an
additional dialog is not necessary. There is already the text "! Not using ODF
1.2 Extended may cause information to be lost." This could be extended by a
hint to make a backup in 'extended' format. And perhaps a link to detailed
information about 'strict' and 'extended'.

There exists the page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes/List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_Extensions.
But that page is currently in such a bad state, that it is not helpful for
users and not even helpful for developers. And the help
[https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/General_7] has only one example about a
feature, which does not exist in 'strict'. Improvement in that area would be a
different issue.


> Finally, block lines 1099 to 1139 from sw/source/filter/xml/xmltble.cxx
> should be executed only if we use odf version > 1.2
> Any thoughts?

Why do you think so? The <office:dde-source> element exists already in ODF 1.1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20181231/e7dc5669/attachment-0001.html>