[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 33173] Tabbed UI (Writer): Division/section-per-tab (similar to Lotus WordPro)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33173

--- Comment #44 from Todd <ToddAndMargo at zoho.com> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #43)
> No question that we have to improve the Navigator, a proposal is here [1].
> But despite all the shortcommings the basic way of dealing with content is
> working well. From the WYSIWYG point of view I doubt that putting content in
> tabbed sections is working well for the majority of users. And there are
> also many requests to have tabs for multiple documents in one app that would
> clash with your proposal.
> 

Hi Heiko,

I use both.  There is no comparison between the annoyance of the Navigator and
effectiveness division tabs.  This is why you now have an army of folks
requestion them.  I am not suggesting that you drop the navigator, but add the
extra usability feature of Division Tabs.  And of course, add the tabs into the
Navigator as well.

I am a consultant to small business.  I have installed installed LibreOffice on
probably a hundred client's computers.  I only have one company that uses
LibreOffice and another that half uses it.  Everyone else has removed it in
favour of you-know-who, which I also sell.  Part of the reason is that they
don't want to learn anything new, which you can do nothing about.  The other
part is of the reason is that so many of the features are difficult and obscure
to use.  Please take your users input and try to make LibreOffice better.

If you keep digging your feet in, your will continue to loose users.  I don't
loose them, I just sell the you-know-who from the evil empire.

Thank you for your consideration,
-T

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20191206/52341c8b/attachment.html>