[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123639] Erasing Master & Slave Fields in form properties does not unlink them from form.

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123639

--- Comment #7 from ribotb <ribotb at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #4)
> The link in the form is created by you. It mustn't be the same link as the
> link in the relationships. So it wouldn't recognize if you change the
> relationship for the tables and will show the old result. If the field of
> the link in the mainform and in the subform do exist it will show the
> related data. Screenshots doesn't show an erazed link from form to subform.
> 
> You have linked, in your example, "IdEdt" of the two tables. You changed the
> value for "editeur" in the table, but the link "IdEdt" is still the same:
> '0' to '0'.
> 
> Could be I don't understand where you see the problem - but I can't see a
> bug. The last screenshot of the attachment shows the right result for
> linking "IdEdt".

Hi,

I simply wanted to reproduce and illustrate the process described by
mmlazgar at shaw.ca. 
I agree that the relationship in the form - subform is not the relationship
traced in physical data model between tables (Tools > Relationships). And so
the fact of removing the relationship in the physical model of the data has no
effect on the relation established between the form and subform.

And I agree that there is no problem if my process is strictly identical to the
process described by mmlazgar at shaw.ca in the bug report.

Unless I have not understood what mmlazgar at shaw.ca was trying to describe...

Bernard

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20190226/0d677d58/attachment.html>