[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107779] Sorting breaks rows data alignement when functions include columns with no data

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107779

--- Comment #12 from Oliver Grimm <logistikka at yahoo.com> ---
ok, thanks, found it now B-]

While I do understand the two use cases for setting or unsetting this option, I
do not understand Eikes reasoning in comment #1. Why should a cell be left out
of sorting only because if refers to something outside the selected range?

When I read "[X] Update references when sorting range of cells." I assume that
references should be updated after sorting all non-formula data. Nothing else.

Therefore I tend to second Lucas point here:
from comment #5: "2) arbitrary restriction of a specifically selected area" is
a problem, if not bug, in my opinion. It does not affect my daily work since I
do not use that option. But it needs to be solved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20190710/37ab616a/attachment.html>