[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120065] GTK3: some Elementary wrap icons are smaller than others, etc

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120065

--- Comment #10 from Rizal Muttaqin <riz_17_oke at yahoo.co.id> ---
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #6)
> Looks an improvement to me. Though in the wrap page of format->image,
> selecting e.g. optimal, and toggling contour on/off shows the same icon for
> optimal with contour on or off. I wonder if there should be a contour
> version of that icon, e.g. sw/res/wr06.png vs sw/res/wr011.png. There is
> also no difference between sw/res/wr01.png (wrap NONE) and sw/res/wr07.png
> (coutour wrap NONE)

Yes, Galaxy use diamond to represent contour on/off. will try to set different
icons as Galaxy has.



As a side note TBH, I personally a little confuse with wrapping in LibO, For
example wrap through the icon it self show image under text but in reality it
vice versa.


Could someone please see wrapping icons in Karasa Jaga theme to see if the
object representation (as leaf) is not suitable?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20190612/585afb02/attachment.html>