[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Tue Sep 22 05:56:58 UTC 2020
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871
--- Comment #52 from Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski at hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #50)
Oh.
I tried hard to explain the problem to Telesto. Tried to explain the idea
behind the feature; its intended user base; who exactly is the model user. In
the end, answering Telesto's request for simple steps, I wrote roughly this:
> See: here is a complex functionality, with involved mix of inheritance,
> layers, dependencies, etc, which is very useful, but from Benjamin's PoV,
> behaves almost randomly.
>
> =========> But here is the button created for Benjamin <=========
>
> after pressing which, the function becomes simple for Benjamin, at the cost
> of masking all the complex machinery beneath.
>
> Now Telesto wants to break the behaviour of the button, in such a way that
> using it results in another complex behaviour, potentially useful for some
> power users, but still confusing for Benjamin.
I hoped that it's rather clear for anyone, that if there is a functionality is
created for some user base, then breaking it exactly for that user base is a
no-go.
Well, the reply is:
> Yes, it's correct; but I fail to see why you say that it's OK above the
> "=========> But here is the button created for Benjamin <=========",
> but having the same below the line is inappropriate...
Am I the one who, respectfully assuming due intelligence in the opponent,
starts suspecting being trolled?
I am done here, trying to "discuss" something with a troll and spammer, who
floods Bugzilla with zillions of low-quality "reports" (unlike in the
beginning); making one who sees "this bug authored by Telesto" to react like
"ah, this is safe to skip".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200922/558390d9/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Libreoffice-bugs
mailing list