[Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus
yfjiang at suse.com
Wed Nov 16 01:10:18 PST 2011
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:38:54PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> 1. Do we need components split in L10n tests?
> I have ever considered the leraning curve when l10n and function test
> doesn't have a consistent scheme. But from reconsidering, it is probably
> natural for a user to see such language split when clicking a
> Localizatoin test group. Plus it reduces the test group size
> significantly, which is my favorite as well. So I give up this concern :)
> Another question is still about how many cases will we have. One thing I
> didn't mention is with this scheme, when we create a test case we need
> to review all the cases to make sure they were not created
> before. Currently we only have 23 cases, it is okay if we review all of
> the cases summaries when creating a new one. But if we get even more cases (> 50
> for example), it becomes painful and hard to manage.
I just remember we still have some artificial id information in test case
summary like (w1, c2 etc.), which could resolve this concern to an operatable
extent :) So I am fine with scheme D now.
More information about the Libreoffice-qa