[Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

Yifan Jiang yfjiang at suse.com
Wed Nov 16 01:10:18 PST 2011

Hi all,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:38:54PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> 1. Do we need components split in L10n tests?
>     I have ever considered the leraning curve when l10n and function test
>     doesn't have a consistent scheme. But from reconsidering, it is probably
>     natural for a user to see such language split when clicking a
>     Localizatoin test group. Plus it reduces the test group size
>     significantly, which is my favorite as well. So I give up this concern :)
>     Another question is still about how many cases will we have. One thing I
>     didn't mention is with this scheme, when we create a test case we need
>     to review all the cases to make sure they were not created
>     before. Currently we only have 23 cases, it is okay if we review all of
>     the cases summaries when creating a new one. But if we get even more cases (> 50
>     for example), it becomes painful and hard to manage.

I just remember we still have some artificial id information in test case
summary like (w1, c2 etc.), which could resolve this concern to an operatable
extent :) So I am fine with scheme D now.

Best wishes,

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list