[Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus
Yifan Jiang
yfjiang at suse.com
Tue Nov 22 02:36:27 PST 2011
Hi Petr,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:55:35AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> IMHO, if nobody objects within next 2-3 days, we could branch it for 3.5
> release, so people could enter test cases for the 3.5 features.
Sure :)
> > - Master Function branch
> >
> > - 8 test groups, only test cases in priority 1, 2 were populated, we
> > didn't have P3/P4 cases yet. The cases were just categorized to
> > priority from my understanding from Petr's comments:
>
> great
>
> BTW: Do you have any plans to create more test cases?
Yes, I have already created several test cases in master/L10n/en covering:
- General UI Localization
- Spellcheck & Grammarcheck
- Thesaurus
- Hyphenation check
- Templates
- Help content
They are not perfect though :)
I also had a plan to review testtool cases and select important testing areas
populating to Litmus. Also we may want this as a mid-term working item
somewhere in wiki.
> > - The name of l10n test cases are updated without "locale" prefix, but
> > I still keep the "component#number" prefix (instead in a appendix
> > brackets) mainly because the test cases will be sorted by components
> > prefix so that all the test cases for the same components canbe
> > reviewed together.
>
> As you like. It might help to synchronize the test cases for different
> languages.
>
> I think that it is only a provisional solution. I hope that we will be
> able to implement the checkbox for lang-dependent test cases and handle
> it in test run and results statistic. Then we could get rid of the l10n
> testgroups and merge all tests into common P1,P2,P3,P4 testgroups.
Yes, plus we have some translating mechanism natively in Litmus, that will be
ideal!
> > - In P3-L10N Test group, there are some "orphan" german test cases
> > because previously the german cases were not exactly synchronized with
> > English versions, these "orphan" cases are remained after my manual
> > synchronization using google translater. I didn't finish review all of
> > them but I'll remove duplicated ones while refer to valuable ones to
> > create new English test cases. Please just ignore them, I'll clean
> > them up later on :)
>
> Sounds reasonable.
Already done :) We only have some duplicated cases there prefixed with
[DELETE]. I'll send a mail to the original arthurs and the list to confirm,
then prefer to remove them.
Best wishes,
Yifan
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list