[Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 05:46:19 PDT 2012

On 07/06/12 12:11, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

>> Could we use the same scheme also in bugzilla? I mean:
>> (3.6.0alpha1)
>> (3.6.0alpha1+daily)
>> (3.6.0beta1)
>> (3.6.0rc1)
> Yes, a big advantage would be if we coud rework the scheme a little so 
> that the version number is more or less in accordance with the timeline. 
> Currently I do not understand " (3.6.0beta1)". If that is 
> Mozilla intention I would prefer something like
>  for alphas
>  for betas
> for RC (example) and/or  release
> for RC (example) and/or  release
> for release(example)

ooh, a release numbering scheme bike shedding thread!

how about this then:

3.6.0.x for alpha/beta
3.6.x.y for RC y of release 3.6.x

yes, that implies that the first actual release is 3.6.1 and there is no
3.6.0 release, but those never work anyway so who cares ;)

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list