[Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon bishop.robinson at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 07:24:59 PDT 2013


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:04:48AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
>> The point here is that if a version is past the EOL and nobody will fix bugs
>> in that branch, there is no point in reporting bugs first observed in 3.4 or
>> 3.5 (otherwise you should NOT remove 3.3 from the list either)
>
> Nope. That a bug appeared first in 3.3 or 3.4 is still valueable information.

Oh, certainly. Perhaps Pedro meant that we shouldn't remove *all* of
the 3.3 builds from the picker, for this very reason. Rainer described
this as "not-release-3.3 [builds]". I think we're mostly in agreement
here :-)

--R


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list