[Libreoffice-qa] Addressing regressions within a release

Joel Madero jmadero.dev at gmail.com
Tue Apr 23 22:21:31 PDT 2013

On 04/23/2013 01:46 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:56:20AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>> For major releases not a problem but for minor releases more of a problem
>> because bibisect is only updated per major release.
> Actually I updated bibisect to work on the source tags (*):
>   https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=tags
> so that one could walk through the micro-releases.
> FWIW, I even build that bibisect repo, but forgot publish it somewhere. I could
> dump it as is somewhere, but would prefer to do so with a up-to-date and
> documented version and have trouble squeezing out time for that right now.
> Best,
> Bjoern
> (*) the code is already pushed at least:
>      https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=dev-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0f162b7ddb76694e96125424beecca48a824dfa;hp=e2139d955539cdfe8d9b6b37a36fa5c5868cbc55
Apologies for my lack of technical skills, but...what does this mean 
exactly? In terms of QA being able to use it, is it ready? Almost ready? 
And for the bibisect repo, that would be up to most recent commit?

Thanks for being patient with my lack of programming lingo :)


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list