[Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Petr Mladek pmladek at suse.cz
Mon Feb 4 09:09:21 PST 2013


Joel Madero píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 08:00 -0800:
> Do we have a consensus on this? I'd like to pitch our idea to ESC this
> week if possible. Don't want this to die and fade away into the abyss
> of thoughts that didn't pan out ;)

To be honest, I am a bit confused by the different opinions. 

My understanding is that we want to proceed and close the bugs.
The open questions are:

   1. how old bugs should get proceed:
	- from 30days to 6 months
	- it is unclear what is preferred by most people

   2. whether to send any warning before
	- 1 or none
	- 1 is more polite but it creates traffic
	- it unclear how many people are for what solution

   3. if we do the warning, it unclear how long to wait with closing the
      bug after the warning:
	- 7 days, 30 days, or even longer?
	- only Rainer supports 7 days; others prefer longer time but
          I am not sure if they did not talk about the time before
          sending the 1st warning

Of course, we also need to decide about the messages but we first need
to decide about the process itself.

A good solution might be voting on this mailing list.


Best Regards,
Petr



More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list