[Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Joel Madero jmadero.dev at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 09:11:38 PST 2013


On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Petr Mladek <pmladek at suse.cz> wrote:

> Joel Madero píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 08:00 -0800:
> > Do we have a consensus on this? I'd like to pitch our idea to ESC this
> > week if possible. Don't want this to die and fade away into the abyss
> > of thoughts that didn't pan out ;)
>
> To be honest, I am a bit confused by the different opinions.
>
> My understanding is that we want to proceed and close the bugs.
> The open questions are:
>
>    1. how old bugs should get proceed:
>         - from 30days to 6 months
>         - it is unclear what is preferred by most people
>
>    2. whether to send any warning before
>         - 1 or none
>         - 1 is more polite but it creates traffic
>         - it unclear how many people are for what solution
>
>    3. if we do the warning, it unclear how long to wait with closing the
>       bug after the warning:
>         - 7 days, 30 days, or even longer?
>         - only Rainer supports 7 days; others prefer longer time but
>           I am not sure if they did not talk about the time before
>           sending the 1st warning
>
> Of course, we also need to decide about the messages but we first need
> to decide about the process itself.
>
> A good solution might be voting on this mailing list.
>

+1, I say let's vote. And thanks for the succinct summary.

Are we agreed that the closing of bugs should be done (aside from the
details of how)?

Let's start with that, if general agreement is yes, we'll move forward with
specific details (I think we should vote per item to allow discussion if
it's needed).

If we agree that closing bugs need done, I can at least present the idea
during the ESC call to give developers a chance to respond. I know there
are some concerns about the mass emails that will happen upon closing them.


Best Regards,
Joel


-- 
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero.dev at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20130204/1eb3ac1c/attachment.html>


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list