[Libreoffice-qa] bug always existed: "unspecified" or "3.3

Florian Reisinger reisi007 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 00:24:42 PST 2013


Hi!

IMHO it should be the earliest beta of the 3.3.0 version...

Am 04.01.2013 00:19, schrieb Tommy:
> hi QA guys,
> I'm gonna ask you one thing about correct labeling the version field 
> in Bugzilla.
>
> If a bug has always been there from first LibO 3.3 release, and maybe 
> is inherited from OOo, which version should I choose: "unspecified" or 
> "3.3.0 beta 2" ?
>
> thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: 
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


-- 
_Florian Reisinger _
LibreOffice herunterladen! <http://de.libreoffice.org/download/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20130104/6be091a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list