[Libreoffice-qa] Why no daily master builds

[Pedro]

Hi Andras


Andras Timar-3 wrote
> No, that's not the case. Tinderboxes are up and running and it was
> never the responsibility of the SUSE staff to fix regressions reported
> by Tinderboxes. 

I never said (or implied) it was their responsibility to fix those
regressions :)

I assumed that the Tinderboxes were a property of Suse and with this change
in Suse's position they would no longer be available for compiling LO
binaries (only some say "tdf-owned hardware" so the owner of e.g. #6 could
be Suse).

Tinderbox #39 manages to produce Windows binaries most days (even if they do
not work in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :)

Regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds-tp4073881p4073919.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.