[Libreoffice-qa] Proposed mass bug change

Robinson Tryon bishop.robinson at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 13:33:14 CET 2014

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that ideally we would go from RESOLVED - FIXED --> VERIFIED
> FIXED -> CLOSED but our team I don't think is quite big enough yet to
> accomplish this.
> Thoughts?

For now, I generally reserve 'VERIFIED FIXED' as something that OP may
set. Given the differences in hardware, OS, and other software (and
the inevitable interactions between them), I'm reticent to 'verify' a
fix unless I'm either the bug reporter or I'm in close contact with
him and have gotten word that he is satisfied with the

But I'm quite open to changes in how we use these terms :-)

> My suggestion is we hold off until we have our own bug
> tracker and continue to encourage more people to join QA - as it grows
> we can tackle these large double checks and closes.


For now, there are indeed bigger fish that need our attention.


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list